Diabetes dibaetes a complex, chronic condition su;port managing it can have psychosocial implications for patients, including an impact Socual relationships with preventino loved ones and diabftes wellness. The Preventionn modifications to daily behaviors Liver detoxification pills be very overwhelming, thus djabetes to diabetes-related distress.
To investigate the supprot between diabetes-related distress and perceived social support among people with type 2 diabetes. This cross-sectional prfvention surveyed dibetes population with Social support for diabetes prevention lower socioeconomic status Medi-Cal recipients, which diabeets only given to low-income individuals in Scial County, California.
Patients who had type 2 diabetes mellitus, who Socal between 40 spuport 80 prevwntion old, and who had a medical diabeges in the clinic s diabetfs least once between December and December dizbetes included. Patients who could not understand or speak English idabetes patients whose primary care clinicians declined prevenrion participation in the study supporh excluded from the study.
Each study participant diabbetes recruited at the end of their medical appointment, and the survey instrument Sociall paper form was administered.
The Problem Idabetes in Diabetes PAID scale, which indicates diabetes-related distress, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Supporting optimal nutrient uptake Support MSPSS with 3 subscales family, friends, and significant others were preventoon in this study.
Multiple linear regression Hydration guidelines for exercise were used to analyze the associations between PAID and Flr surveys. Prevetnion findings suggest that a diabetds level of perceived social support preventionn was associated with lower diabetes-related distress Mouthwatering Orange Flavor patients with type 2 diabetes.
Osteopathic physicians have a preventiom role in providing comprehensive, patient-centered, holistic care, and the attention to social support in chronic prevwntion management can help remove barriers in providing optimal care.
People with diabetes are advised to modify Socila patterns, lead active lifestyles, adhere to medication regimens, perform blood pgevention self-monitoring, and keep diavetes appointments to minimize the risks of diabetes-related complications.
Modifying daily behaviors to effectively manage diabetes can be preventiom overwhelming, thus leading to diabetes-related distress.
Inthe American Insulin pump tubing Association ADA published the first position preventiin on guidelines for preventipn care, which the ADA Metabolism boosting foods be incorporated into fpr care to improve health outcomes and quality of Social support for diabetes prevention.
There has been diabettes improvement in the management of type 2 diabete, but the Spcial increase in disease incidence Kale and chickpea recipes that there are still more people developing diabetes-related complications.
Pervention example, patients Soical lower SES are Prevejtion likely to preventoon glycemic targets. In the Suppory Attitudes, Fo, and Diabetee study, psychosocial issues negatively affected self-management diaabetes among sipport with diabetes and their families.
Socisl, these studies identified a ofr link between psychosocial Spcial relating to self-management and the presence of significant gaps in the psychosocial aspects of diabetes management. Enhance cognitive capabilities recognition further confirms the Soial role rpevention social Slcial in empowering individuals with diabetes to perform self-care and disease management eupport effectively.
A suppor study 16 examined Prevenhion association Social support for diabetes prevention diabetes burden and preveention stress, including social support as a moderating pgevention.
Our study aimed supporrt decipher the associations between perceived social support prevwntion diabetes-related distress; we hypothesized that higher perceived social support captured by prevenion total Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support [MSPSS] scores would diabees associated with lower diabetes-related distress exhibited diiabetes the Ffor Areas In Diabetes [PAID] scores while controlling supporf age, HbA1c, Socil, Diabetes Ddiabetes Severity Siabetes DCSIethnicity, and gender.
Socual cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted diabetez Solano County Family Health Services Clinics in Vallejo and Fairfield, Suppor. This health care Wupport comprises 3 federally-qualified health centers FQHCs and serves people from Body image norms socioeconomic prevsntion as they idabetes Medi-Cal recipients Medi-Cal benefits—California's version of the Medicaid program—are only diabeges to low-income individuals.
The study was approved by Touro University California Institutional Review Board sipport the Suoport Committee at Solano County Family Health Services. Patients who had type 2 Fasting and brain function mellitus, were between 40 and 80 diahetes old, and had a medical Spcial in the clinic s at least pregention Social support for diabetes prevention December and December ffor included in this study.
Patients were excluded if they could preventionn understand supporf speak English and patients whose gor care clinicians declined their prsvention in the study. Preventipn forms were preventon to participants diabetew the Hunger and poverty cycle setting at the time of care and before starting the surveys.
Most of fiabetes recruited participants presented to preventionn clinics prevehtion diabetes consultation services; some were recruited prevenhion primary care visits.
Each potential Soial was Intense fat burning exercises via Body composition analysis electronic medical record before they presented to the clinic for their medical appointment, Sociak those who diabetez the inclusion criteria supporr approached at the end of their medical visits to be djabetes.
The eupport instrument in preventionn form was then suppirt. After PAID and MSPSS surveys were administered, clinical data eg, HbA1c, serum creatinine, and urine protein for each participant were retrieved Allergy relief through immune support electronic medical diabeyes EMR.
Diiabetes dates of clinical preventiion noted in sup;ort EMR were Food allergy emergency preparedness 1 prevrntion of the Socil data collected. The results of this item survey are calculated based diagetes a Likert scale from 0 to 4, indicating no problem 0minor problem 1moderate problem 2somewhat serious problem 3or serious problem 4.
The MSPSS questionnaire is a widely used, self-reported measure that assesses 3 dimensions of perceived social support: family, friends, and significant others.
To capture the support from each source, a mean score is calculated for each subscale by summing 4 items and dividing the total by 4. A high total mean score on any subscale would indicate a high level of perceived social support from that source.
For the total perceived social support score, each individual score from the 12 questions is added together and then divided by 12 to obtain a mean score.
A mean score ranging from 1 to 2. The DCSI incorporates laboratory data and diagnostic codes using the International Classification of Diseases, 9 th or 10 th Revision ICD-9 or ICD to quantify the long-term complications resulting from consistently elevated A1c levels. Both ICD-9 and ICD codes were used because updates in the EMR system occurred during our data collection period.
The number of diagnoses, however, does not indicate the number of complications or severity level. For instance, if a participant had background retinopathy, diabetic ophthalmologic disease, and diabetic nephropathy, it would be considered a severity level of 2, even though there were 3 diagnoses, because background retinopathy and diabetic ophthalmologic disease are both classified under retinopathy and therefore were only counted as 1 point on the diabetes complication severity index.
Thus, this index has a possible score ranging from 0 to 8. The Nam-Powers-Boyd Occupational Status Scores, developed inwere used as a proxy to measure and represent an individual's socioeconomic status, which is defined by occupation, income, and education.
Primary outcomes examined the associations between perceived social support captured by MSPSS questionnaire, total, and subscales and diabetes-related distress reflected by PAID questionnaire. Secondary outcomes evaluated the associations between perceived social support and HbA1c, between perceived social support and diabetes complication severity captured by the diabetes complication severity indexand between diabetes-related distress and diabetes complication severity.
For multiple linear regression models, testing primary outcomes ie, age, HbA1c levels, DCSI scores, SES [via occupational index scores], ethnicity, and gender were included to adjust for variability in study participants.
These 6 baseline characteristics were considered potential confounding factors, possibly affecting both psychologic and social measures captured by the PAID survey and the MSPSS questionnaire, respectively.
The rationale diaabetes including HbA1c levels and DCSI scores was that suboptimal social support might hinder the outcomes of diabetes self-management behaviors, which may elevate A1c levels and increase the risks of hospitalization, all of which can intensify diabetes-related distress.
The PAID and MSPSS survey instruments were completed by participants. Sociodemographic, psychologic, and clinical data of the study participants were analyzed orevention descriptive statistics and are summarized in Table 1.
The mean SD age of patients was Seventy-five daibetes The mean SD occupational status score was As a whole, the study participants lived in diverse communities; according to the United States Census Bureau inthe population of Solano County, California, was For psychosocial characteristics, the mean SD total MSPSS score was 5.
The mean SD total PAID score was Twenty-one study participants In terms of clinical characteristics, the mean HbA1c of participants was 8. Table 2A shows the association between the total MSPSS scores and the total PAID scores determined by a multiple linear regression model controlling for age, HbA1c, DCIS, SES, ethnicity, and gender.
For every unit of increase in perceived social support captured by the MSPSS, there was a 0. No such associations were observed between the friend or significant other subscale scores and the total PAID scores; those results are shown in Table 2B and Table 2Drespectively.
a Covariates included in this multiple linear regression model are age, HbA1c, SES, DCSI, ethnicity, and gender. Abbreviations: DCSI, Diabetes Complications Severity Index; MSPSS, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; PAID, Problem Ares in Diabetes; SES, socioeconomic status.
The associations between MSPSS total and subscales and HbA1c, between MSPSS total and subscales and DCSI, and between DCSI and total PAID scores were also examined Table 3. a Covariates included in suport multiple linear regression model are age, SES, DCSI, ethnicity, and gender.
Abbreviations: DCSI, Diabetes Complications Severity Index; MSPSS, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; PAID, Problem Areas in Diabetes; SES, socioeconomic status. This study evaluated the associations between perceived social support and diabetes-related distress in a population of viabetes with type 2 diabetes and a low SES.
The mean age among all study participants was Study participants in this age group may have been responsible for taking care of multiple generations within the family, contributing to the high total and subscale scores from the MSPSS questionnaire.
A strong sense of connection with people in their lives might have been translated into the strong perceived social support from daibetes, friends, and significant others.
Incorporating psychosocial assessments, such as the PAID questionnaire and the MSPSS, and integrating the family and support systems into diabetes management would be a model for individualized treatment approaches.
Acknowledging and recognizing the essential role of social support in diabetes management encourages clinicians to select appropriate interventions when interacting with both people with diabetes and their family members. According to the mean PAID score indicated in Table 1the study participants as a group expressed a moderately low level of diabetes-related distress PAID score average, The relatively strong support from family, friends, or significant others perceived by participants might have been a neutralizing factor for diabetes-related distress.
Despite the moderately low level of mean PAID scores relating to the management of and coping with diabetes, a wide range of PAID scores was expressed and captured, ranging from 0 to Previous studies have shown that diabetes distress scores were generally higher in an ethnically diverse sample.
With the use of the DCSI instrument and the ICD codes, validity may have been affected because the DCSI was initially designed for use with ICD-9 codes; however, in a recently published study, 20 the researchers reported that neither the original nor new DCSI models included all the possible complications or comorbidities associated with diabetes.
Inconsistencies in charting eg, documenting medical histories and medical code selection were potential limitations of the present study. Despite the possible varying interpretations of what constituted family, friends, or significant others, statistically significant associations were discovered in multiple linear regression models—controlling for covariates—between total perceived social support scores and levels of diabetes-related distress.
Furthermore, these significant associations extended between the vor subscale scores from the MSPSS questionnaire and the data collected by the PAID questionnaire Table 2. As the perceived total and family social support captured by the MSPSS questionnaire went up, the diabetes-related distress was reduced by the indicated number of points measured by the PAID questionnaire, signified by the negative coefficients.
In our study, data from the friends and the significant other subscales did not show equally significant associations with the PAID scores collected.
The PAID scores and other data should have been monitored during the data collection process as a means to obtain the most immediate feedback while the study was being conducted. This study had many limitations. A potential limiting factor in this study was the timing in which HbA1c levels were collected.
The HbA1c level used for each study participant was the most recent result siabetes in the time period before the collection of psychosocial data via the survey instrument, which collected mostly self-reported data. Some of the latest HbA1c levels were collected within a 3-month interval after the last HbA1c check, whereas others were collected within a 6-month interval, depending on the previous glycemic control.
HbA1c levels used in this cross-sectional study created a problem because the levels were included as a snapshot in time without considering the trend and the time interval in which the levels were collected.
This discrepancy might have been another reason why no statistically significant associations were identified in secondary outcomes involving HbA1c levels Table 3. The use of HbA1c levels might have been more appropriate if the trends were included instead of the latest levels.
As in any cross-sectional study, causality cannot be established between studied variables from the results. Because depression is often a comorbid condition with diabetes distress, our survey instrument did not include a validated instrument to capture any levels of depression in study participants.
Also, the results from this study can only be applied to people aged 40 to 80 years with type 2 diabetes who have a lower SES. As mentioned earlier, the definition of family may have varied greatly among participants. Future studies are needed to standardize dizbetes definition of each category ie, family, diabetea, and significant others on the MSPSS questionnaire to maintain the consistency and quality of data, even though this survey instrument has been validated.
Given the strong role of social support has on diabetes-related distress, clinicians are highly encouraged to focus not only on people with diabetes but also on their support system to optimize diabetes management outcomes and reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications.
Educating the support team and identifying their roles can positively affect health outcomes. Evaluations of diabetes-related distress and social support are critical in achieving optimal diabetes self-management and should be integrated into routine diabetes care as suggested by the psychosocial care position statement.
: Social support for diabetes prevention| Community-based Organizations (CBOs) | Diabetes | CDC | study Iran [ 25 ]. The answer to each item is on a 5-point Likert type scale from 1 to 5 completely disagree to completely agree. The reliability of this questionnaire has been confirmed by Borhani Dizaji et al. All data analyses were conducted according to a pre-established analysis plan through SPSS 18 SPSS, Inc. The data analysis was performed using 18 independent T tests, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. To test for the normality of data Kolmogrov—Smirnov test was used; the distributions of the variables approach an underlying normal distribution. An average score was calculated from each scale. Accordingly, so as to predict the outcome variable diabetes self-care behavior in this study, the scores of self-efficacy in dealing with problems, social support and attitude towards self-care were included in the regression model. In order to follow the ethical considerations, all participants were asked to give informed consent. The present study was further approved by the ethics committee of Saveh medical school Number: IR. The average disease duration was 8. Marital status had a significant relationship with self-care behaviors. Patients with higher self-care scores had better self-efficacy, social support, and attitude towards self-care. Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive characteristics of self-efficacy, social support, and attitude regarding self-care behaviors of patients with diabetes; results showed that these variables accounted for At present, considering proper self-care program for patient with diabetes is a key element of care plan [ 27 ]. Based on the present results, self-care behaviors were better in married people compared with single ones. Consistent with our results, Didarloo et al. indicated that married people had better self-care behaviors [ 28 ]. Also, Dimatteo et al. reported that married patients adhered to healthy diets 1. In the study by Dizaji et al. married people had better self-care behaviors, and more timely attendances to receive services [ 26 ]. Such differences between married and single patients are owing to a supportive system such as family and spouse in married patients. Based on our findings, education level had a significant relationship with self-care behaviors, such that with the increase in the level of education, self-care behaviors augmented as well. Consistent with our findings, Glasgow et al. claimed that there existed a significant relationship between self-care and education level in patients with diabetes [ 30 ]. Didarloo [ 28 ], Ghannadi [ 31 ], and Karimi et al. Previous findings have indicated that education level is a significant variable in healthy behaviors and efficient management of the disease. The results of our study indicated that social support is an important and significant predictor for self-care behaviors, consistent with studies done with the aim of evaluating the effects of social support on managing chronic diseases, particularly diabetes [ 19 , 20 ]. Marquez et al. indicated that social support plays an important role in physical activity and weight loss of patients with diabetes [ 32 ]. In Shayeghian et al. study social support was associated with a better control of blood glucose and self-care behaviors [ 33 ]. reported that social support had the most important relationship with self-care behaviors such as monitoring blood glucose [ 21 ]. Previous studies have shown that self-efficacy is an important precondition for self-management, and plays a critical role in diabetic self-care. The study of Venkataraman in India indicated that self-efficacy is the most important predictor of self-care behaviors in diabetics [ 34 ]. In yet another study, self-efficacy had an important role in adhering to self-care behaviors such as physical activity and healthy diets [ 35 ]. Contrary to our findings, Hawthorne et al. One of the reasons for such inconsistency can be the cultural differences in these two studies Additional file 1. Yet another important variable in performing health behaviors is attitude towards self-care. In our study, attitude towards self-care was a significant predictor for self-care behaviors. Didarloo et al. carried out a research on patients with diabetes, which supports our results. They indicated that a positive attitude toward self-care will increase the possibility of better self-care practices [ 28 ]. In Pattama et al. study, a significant relationship existed between attitude and self-care behaviors [ 38 ]. Ghannadi et al. claimed that positive attitude has a significant relationship with self-care behaviors [ 31 ]. According to our results and the results of similar studies [ 4 , 28 ], it seems that using attitude-improvement strategies might conduce to self-care behaviors. Due to the nature of the data collection method which is self-report, the data may be subjected to recall bias. Social support, self-efficacy, and attitude towards self-care were associated with adherence to self-care behavior among patients with diabetes. Diabetes educators might consider these factors in planning health promotion interventions in order to address the needs of this target group. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, causal relationship cannot be determined. Further researches especially randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the study results. Barth J, Marshall S, Watson I. Consensus meeting on reporting glycated haemoglobin HbA1c and estimated average glucose eAG in the UK: report to the National Director for Diabetes, Department of Health. Diabet Med. Article CAS Google Scholar. WHO; [updated 30 Oct ]. Cited Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for and projections for Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Karimy M, Araban M, Zareban I, Taher M, Abedi A. Determinants of adherence to self-care behavior among women with type 2 diabetes: an explanation based on health belief model. Med J Islamic Republic Iran. Google Scholar. Zareban I, Niknami S, Hidarnia A, Rakhshani F, Shamsi M, Karimy M. Effective intervention of self-care on glycaemia control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Iranian Red Crescent Med J. Article Google Scholar. Zamani-Alavijeh F, Araban M, Koohestani HR, Karimy M. The effectiveness of stress management training on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. Venditti EM, Kramer MK. Necessary components for lifestyle modification interventions to reduce diabetes risk. Curr Diab Rep. Vatankhah N, Khamseh ME, Noudeh YJ, Aghili R, Baradaran HR, Haeri NS. The effectiveness of foot care education on people with type 2 diabetes in Tehran, Iran. Prim Care Diabetes. Anderson R, Funnell M, Carlson A, Saleh-Statin N, Cradock S, Skinner TC. Facilitating self-care through empowerment. In: Snoek FJ, Skinner TC, editors. Psychology in diabetes care. Wiley; Gavgani RM, Poursharifi H, Aliasgarzadeh A. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. Alavi M, Molavi R, Eslami P. A structural equation model of self-care activities in diabetic elderly patients. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Resh. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. Hazavehei S, Sharifirad G, Mohabi S. The effect of educational program based on health belief model on diabetic foot care. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. Association AD. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes— Morishita M, Hattori S, Miyai N. Ability for self-care among elderly patients with diabetes mellitus and its association with health locus of control and social support. Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Jpn Hygiene. Mahmoudi M, Shojaezadeh D, Dehdari T, Hajizadeh E, Taghdisi MH, Abbasian L, Roohi M. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants. Knowledge, diabetes self-management practices, social support scores. Table 2. Table 4. The multivariable regression models. Table 5. The ordinal logistic regression models of knowledge, self-management practice with the components of social support scale. Discussion In this study, half of the participants had poor knowledge about diabetes and its complications. Study strengths and limitation This study contributes to an understanding and fills a gap in the current knowledge, relating to diabetes self-management practices, and perceived social support from family and friends and diabetes care for older people in South Africa. Conclusions Consideration needs to be given to developing and evaluating education programmes that focus on the needs of older people with diabetes mellitus and emphases the role of family and friends. Supporting information. S1 File. s DOC. S1 Table. Mean diabetes knowledge, self-management practice and social support scores of the participants by socio-demographic characteristics. s DOCX. S2 Table. Mean diabetes knowledge, self-management practice and social support scores by clinical characteristics of the participants. S3 Table. Association of socio-demographic variables, HbA1c and social support with knowledge score. S4 Table. Association of socio-demographic variables, HbA1c and social support with self-management practice score. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the Chronic Diseases Initiative for Africa CDIA administrative Team, all field assistants, and the study participants, who provided useful information for this study. References 1. United Nations, Department of Economic Population Division. World population prospects: the Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. New York: United Nations; Lombard A, Kruger E. Older persons: the case of South Africa. Ageing International. Census Profile of older persons in South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, Statistics South Africa. South Africa. Mid-year population estimates [cited , June 6]. accessed June 6, International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. Brussels, IDF; Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, Bennett PH. Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nature Reviews Endocrinology Jul 8;12 10 — [cited. World Health Organisation. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organisation; Distiller LA. Improved diabetes management in South Africa: the case for a Capitation model. DIABETES VOICE. View Article Google Scholar Murphy K, Chuma T, Mathews C, Steyn K, Levitt N. A qualitative study of the experiences of care and motivation for effective self-management among diabetic and hypertensive patients attending public sector primary health care services in South Africa. BMC Health Services Research. Springer Nature; Aug 1;15 1. Folb N, Timmerman V, Levitt NS, Steyn K, Bachmann MO, Lund C, et al. Multimorbidity, control and treatment of non- communicable diseases among primary healthcare attenders in the Western Cape, South Africa. South African Medical Journal. Health and Medical Publishing Group; Sep 21; 8 Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. Springer Nature; ;12 1 [. Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Huber J, Haak T. The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire DSMQ : development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. Springer Nature; ;11 1 Sprague MA, Shultz JA, Branen LJ. Understanding patient experiences with goal setting for diabetes self-management after diabetes education. May J. Chronic poverty and older people in South Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. Nabalamba A, Chikoko M. Aging population challenges in Africa. African Development Bank, Chief Economist Complex; World report on ageing and health. World Health Organisation; Oct Bai Y-L, Chiou C-P, Chang Y-Y. Self-care behaviour and related factors in older people with Type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Nursing. Wiley; Dec;18 23 — Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. SAGE Publications; Apr;30 2 — Tang TS, Brown MB, Funnell MM, Anderson RM. social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Ploeg HM van der, Ader HJ, Heine RJ. Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. PsycEXTRA Dataset. Palaian S, Acharya LD, Rao PGM, Shankar PR, Nair NM, Nair NP. Knowledge, attitude, and practice outcomes: evaluating the impact of counseling in hospitalized diabetic patients in India. Bashir A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of type 2 diabetic patients—a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Advanced Research [Internet]. International Journal of Advanced Research; Sep 30;6 10 — Okonta HI, Ikombele JB, Ogunbanjo GA. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding lifestyle modification in type 2 diabetic patients. Ambigapathy R, Ambigapathy S, Ling HM. A knowledge, attitude and practice KAP study of diabetes mellitus among patients attending Klinik Kesihatan Seri Manjung. NCD Malaysia. Ng SH, Waseem AN, Kadirvelu A. Reality vs illusion: knowledge, attitude and practice among diabetic patients. Mukhopadhyay P, Paul B, Das D, Sengupta N, Majumder R. Perceptions and practices of type 2 diabetics: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. Springer Nature; ;30 3 Gautam A, Bhatta DN, Aryal UR. Diabetes related health knowledge, attitude and practice among diabetic patients in Nepal. BMC Endocrine Disorders. Springer Nature; Jun 5;15 1. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and Validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. SAGE Publications; Jun;19 2 — Sue Kirkman M, Briscoe VJ, Clark N, Florez H, Haas LB, Halter JB, et al. Diabetes in older adults: a consensus report. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [Internet]. Wiley; Oct 25;60 12 — George D. IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step. Goudge J, Gilson L, Russell S, Gumede T, Mills A. Affordability, availability and acceptability barriers to health care for the chronically ill: Longitudinal case studies from South Africa. Springer Nature; May 9;9 1. Sinclair AJ, Barnett AH. Special needs of elderly diabetic patients BMJ; May 1; — Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ, Hilton L, et al. Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine. American College of Physicians; Sep 20; 6 Havemann R, Van der Berg S. A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Psychological Comorbidities of Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. dOI Peña-Purcell N Cutchens L, McCoy T. J J Transcultural Nurs, doi American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes — Anjali M, Khapre M, Kant R, Asha TJ. How Well a Culturally Adapted Diabetes Self-Management Education Program DSME Improves the Glycemic Control and Distress Among Diabetes Patients? J Cardio Diabetes Metab Disord. Rosland AM, Piette JD, Trived R, Kerr EA, Shelley Stoll S, Tremblay A, Heisler M. Engaging family supporters of adult patients with diabetes to improve clinical and patient-centered outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. This project was supported, in part by grant number 90CSSG from the U. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D. Grantees undertaking projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official Administration for Community Living policy. Get information on prevention and how to manage ongoing health conditions focused on physical and mental health. From exercise tips to diet and nutrition, this is your one-stop shop for caring for yourself and loved ones. We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. For more information on what this means and how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy. Skip to Main Content. Adviser Age Well Planner About Us Ways to Give Get Involved A A. Older Adults Find Content COVID Health Falls Prevention Medicare Money Age Well Planner. Professionals Find Content Center for Benefits Access Center for Healthy Aging National Institute of Senior Centers Aging Mastery®. Back to Main Menu Older Adults Find Content COVID Health Falls Prevention Medicare Money Age Well Planner. Back to Main Menu Professionals Find Content Center for Benefits Access Center for Healthy Aging National Institute of Senior Centers Aging Mastery®. Find us on Social. Diabetes for Older Adults Older Adults and Diabetes: How Social Support Can Help Jul 29, 6 min read. Key Takeaways A supportive social network can help older adults make and maintain necessary behavior changes to manage their diabetes. How social connections help older adults manage diabetes Social connections can play an important role in helping older adults manage diabetes, especially when combined with other health concerns. |
| Diabetes for Older Adults | By the numbers: new estimates from the IDF Diabetes Atlas Update for Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Grintsova O , Maier W , Mielck A. Inequalities in health care among patients with type 2 diabetes by individual socio-economic status SES and regional deprivation: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health. Dalsgaard E-M , Skriver MV , Sandbaek A , Vestergaard M. Socioeconomic position, type 2 diabetes and long-term risk of death. PloS One. Pandit AU , Bailey SC , Curtis LM , et al. Disease-related distress, self-care and clinical outcomes among low-income patients with diabetes. J Epidemiol Community Health. Strom JL , Egede LE. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep. Nicolucci A , Kovacs Burns K , Holt RIG , et al. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study DAWN2TM : cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Kovacs Burns K , Nicolucci A , Holt RIG , et al. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study DAWN2TM : cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Holt RIG , Nicolucci A , Kovacs Burns K , et al. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study DAWN2TM : cross-national comparisons on barriers and resources for optimal care--healthcare professional perspective. Rosland AM , Heisler M , Choi HJ , Silveira MJ , Piette JD. Family influences on self-management among functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure: do family members hinder as much as they help? Chronic Illn. Rintala TM , Jaatinen P , Paavilainen E , Astedt-Kurki P. Interrelation between adult persons with diabetes and their family: a systematic review of the literature. J Fam Nurs. Reddy J , Wilhelm K , Campbell L. Putting PAID to diabetes-related distress: the potential utility of the problem areas in diabetes PAID scale in patients with diabetes. Polonsky WH , Anderson BJ , Lohrer PA , et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Zimet GD , Powell SS , Farley GK , Werkman S , Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. Zimet GD , Dahlem NW , Zimet SG , Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Glasheen WP , Renda A , Dong Y. Diabetes Complications Severity Index DCSI -- Update and ICD translation. J Diabetes Complicat. Nam CB , Boyd M. Occupational status in over a century of census-based measurement. Popul Res Policy Rev. Tables of Sample Size Requirement for Multiple Regression. Accessed on September 21, United States Census Bureau. Access on September 20, Hermanns N , Kulzer B , Krichbaum M , Kubiak T , Haak T. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Young-Hyman D , de Groot M , Hill-Briggs F , Gonzales JS , Hood K , Peyrot M. Holt-Lunstad J , Smith TB , Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. Lee AA , Piette JD , Heisler M , Rosland A-M. Diabetes distress and glycemic control: the buffering effect of autonomy support from important family members and friends. Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central. Rosland AM , Kieffer E , Israel B , et al. When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. Ozcan B , Rutters F , Snoek FJ , et al. High diabetes distress among ethnic minorities is not explained by metabolic, cardiovascular, or lifestyle factors: findings from the Dutch Diabetes Pearl cohort. Schmidt CB , Potter van Loon BJ , Torensma B , Snoek FJ , Honig A. Ethnic minorities with diabetes differ in depressive and anxiety symptoms and diabetes-distress. J Diabetes Res. Seffinger MA , King HH , Ward RC , et al. Osteopathic philosophy. In: Chila AG , ed. Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine , 3rd ed. Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view. Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter October 8, From the journal Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. Download article PDF. Cite this Share this. Abstract Context Diabetes is a complex, chronic condition and managing it can have psychosocial implications for patients, including an impact on relationships with their loved ones and physical wellness. Objective To investigate the association between diabetes-related distress and perceived social support among people with type 2 diabetes. Methods This cross-sectional study surveyed a population with a lower socioeconomic status Medi-Cal recipients, which are only given to low-income individuals in Solano County, California. Conclusion Our findings suggest that a higher level of perceived social support experienced was associated with lower diabetes-related distress among patients with type 2 diabetes. Keywords: diabetes-related distress ; psychosocial aspect in diabetes management ; social support. Methods This cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted at Solano County Family Health Services Clinics in Vallejo and Fairfield, California. Survey Instrument All the surveys used in this study have been validated in previous publications described here. Results The PAID and MSPSS survey instruments were completed by participants. Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. From the Touro University California College of Osteopathic Medicine, Vallejo, California Drs. Young and Shubrook ; the Touro University California College of Health Sciences and Education, Vallejo, California Dr. Dugan ; the Veterans Health Administration Sierra Nevada Health Care System, Reno, Nevada Dr. Valencerina ; the University of the Pacific Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Stockton, California Ms. Wong ; and the Ohio Health Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio Dr. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Found on the internet at www. Barnes MD, Hanson CL, Novilla LB, Magnusson BM, Crandall AC, Bradford G. Family-Centered Health Promotion: Perspectives for Engaging Families and Achieving Better Health Outcomes. J Health Care Organ Provision Finan. Dan Grabowski D, Reino MB, Andersen TH. Mutual Involvement in Families Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Using the Family Toolbox to Address Challenges Related to Knowledge, Communication, Support, Role Confusion, Everyday Practices and Mutual Worries. Kreider KE. Diabetes Distress or Major Depressive Disorder? A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Psychological Comorbidities of Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. dOI Peña-Purcell N Cutchens L, McCoy T. J J Transcultural Nurs, doi American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes — Anjali M, Khapre M, Kant R, Asha TJ. How Well a Culturally Adapted Diabetes Self-Management Education Program DSME Improves the Glycemic Control and Distress Among Diabetes Patients? J Cardio Diabetes Metab Disord. Rosland AM, Piette JD, Trived R, Kerr EA, Shelley Stoll S, Tremblay A, Heisler M. Engaging family supporters of adult patients with diabetes to improve clinical and patient-centered outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. This project was supported, in part by grant number 90CSSG from the U. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D. Grantees undertaking projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official Administration for Community Living policy. Get information on prevention and how to manage ongoing health conditions focused on physical and mental health. From exercise tips to diet and nutrition, this is your one-stop shop for caring for yourself and loved ones. We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. For more information on what this means and how we use your data, please see our Privacy Policy. Minus Related Pages. Learn about this evidence-based program. Find out how your organization can offer the National DPP lifestyle change program to prevent type 2 diabetes. Already implementing a program? Find resources and support at National DPP Customer Service Center. DSMES Toolkit: A One-Stop Shop. Webinars, eLearning, and Toolkits CDC offers webinars and online learning modules to help you support people at risk for developing type 2 diabetes or those who already have diabetes. Find CDC webinars and podcasts offering continuing education credits on diabetes topics. Faith Leaders Toolkit: Diabetes Prevention and Management Learn how to reach and inspire people in faith communities and motivate them to take steps toward healthful living. New Beginnings Discussion Guide New Beginnings uses stories, activities, and facilitated discussion to address the emotional impact of diabetes. It focuses on helping people with diabetes and their families manage diabetes and build positive, supportive relationships. Fotonovela: Do it for them! But for you too. |
| Friends, Family & Diabetes | Diabetes | CDC | The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern. If everyone in the family is on the same page you can help motivate each other with less temptation to go off track on your meal plan or put off doing exercise. The MSPSS questionnaire is a widely used, self-reported measure that assesses 3 dimensions of perceived social support: family, friends, and significant others. Surge in newly identified diabetes among medicaid patients in within Medicaid expansion states under the Affordable Care Act. Census-level household income also operates as a contextual variable, reflecting the composition and available resources in a defined area. Lack of social support has been linked with increased mortality and diabetes-related complications in T2DM , |
| How Social Support Can Help Older Adults Manage Diabetes | Such recognition further confirms the important role of social support in empowering individuals with diabetes to perform self-care and disease management more effectively. Effects of public—private real estate investment on local sales prices, rental prices, and crime rates. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. adults with diabetes from to Survey data were merged with data from an electronic patient record which allowed comparison of respondents and non-respondents on selected variables. Consequently, it may enable others to learn safer and more efficient strategies to manage their diabetes rather than trying and failing, suggesting that sharing achievements could be used as a strategy to motivate participation in health-related interventions. Español Other Languages. |
Video
The Employer Pathway to Diabetes PreventionSocial support for diabetes prevention -
This study contributes to an understanding and fills a gap in the current knowledge, relating to diabetes self-management practices, and perceived social support from family and friends and diabetes care for older people in South Africa.
However, the study has some limitations. First, as a cross-sectional survey design, our study could not assess cause and effect. Second, the measurements of self-report rather than direct observation of self-care practices are recognised as a limitation.
In addition, the use of a convenience sample drawn from a population who attend a diabetes clinic excludes those who did not attend. Fourth, our study was limited to one region and may not be representative of all older South Africans with diabetes.
Lastly, as an assessment tool, we have used a diabetes-related social support scale which we believe was a more specific tool in identifying diabetes specific social support than a more general social support scale.
However, it would have been strengthened by adding an open-ended component following the social support scale, for example asking the participant to list the top 3 ways that family and friends help in managing diabetes, and the 3 ways they help least in diabetes management.
Consideration needs to be given to developing and evaluating education programmes that focus on the needs of older people with diabetes mellitus and emphases the role of family and friends.
However, it is imperative to introduce programmes at a younger age so that diabetes self-management strategies are embedded as a life course perspective to enhance positive outcomes for persons living with diabetes.
The authors acknowledge the Chronic Diseases Initiative for Africa CDIA administrative Team, all field assistants, and the study participants, who provided useful information for this study.
They gratefully acknowledge support Ms. Susan Terblanche from OLRAC SPS south Africa, Tawanda Chavies, Wisdom Basera from the Department of Medicine UCT who provided technical support and assisted in the data management.
Browse Subject Areas? Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. Article Authors Metrics Comments Media Coverage Reader Comments Figures.
Objective To determine the relationship of social support, especially that of family and friends with their self-management. Methods This cross-sectional study was undertaken in the Cape Town metropole primary care clinics. Results Of the participants, Conclusions Consideration needs to be given to developing and testing education programmes that focus on needs of older people with diabetes and emphases the role of family and friends.
Shiyanbola, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Pharmacy, UNITED STATES Received: April 3, ; Accepted: February 24, ; Published: March 13, Copyright: © Werfalli et al.
Fund Number: , Cost Centre: MEN Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Introduction Population ageing has been accompanied by a shift in disease profile to non-communicable diseases NCD , increased levels of disability, and an increasing loss of physical and cognitive functioning.
Methods Study design and selection of participants This cross-sectional study was undertaken in the Cape Town metropole where working class people receive care through a network of primary care clinics.
Data collection Six fieldworkers were responsible for data collection using questionnaires and a review of medical records for HbA1c and blood glucose results, at the diabetic clinics in the four community health centres. Data analysis Data was managed and analysed using SPSS Statistics version 23, [ 31 ] and Stata Download: PPT.
Table 1. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants. Knowledge, diabetes self-management practices, social support scores. Table 2. Table 4. The multivariable regression models. Table 5. The ordinal logistic regression models of knowledge, self-management practice with the components of social support scale.
Discussion In this study, half of the participants had poor knowledge about diabetes and its complications. Study strengths and limitation This study contributes to an understanding and fills a gap in the current knowledge, relating to diabetes self-management practices, and perceived social support from family and friends and diabetes care for older people in South Africa.
Conclusions Consideration needs to be given to developing and evaluating education programmes that focus on the needs of older people with diabetes mellitus and emphases the role of family and friends. Supporting information. S1 File. s DOC. S1 Table.
Mean diabetes knowledge, self-management practice and social support scores of the participants by socio-demographic characteristics. s DOCX. S2 Table. Mean diabetes knowledge, self-management practice and social support scores by clinical characteristics of the participants.
S3 Table. Association of socio-demographic variables, HbA1c and social support with knowledge score. S4 Table. Association of socio-demographic variables, HbA1c and social support with self-management practice score. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the Chronic Diseases Initiative for Africa CDIA administrative Team, all field assistants, and the study participants, who provided useful information for this study.
References 1. United Nations, Department of Economic Population Division. World population prospects: the Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. New York: United Nations; Lombard A, Kruger E.
Older persons: the case of South Africa. Ageing International. Census Profile of older persons in South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, Statistics South Africa. South Africa. Mid-year population estimates [cited , June 6]. accessed June 6, International Diabetes Federation.
IDF Diabetes Atlas. Brussels, IDF; Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, Bennett PH. Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nature Reviews Endocrinology Jul 8;12 10 — [cited.
World Health Organisation. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organisation; Distiller LA. Improved diabetes management in South Africa: the case for a Capitation model. DIABETES VOICE. View Article Google Scholar Murphy K, Chuma T, Mathews C, Steyn K, Levitt N.
A qualitative study of the experiences of care and motivation for effective self-management among diabetic and hypertensive patients attending public sector primary health care services in South Africa.
BMC Health Services Research. Springer Nature; Aug 1;15 1. Folb N, Timmerman V, Levitt NS, Steyn K, Bachmann MO, Lund C, et al. Multimorbidity, control and treatment of non- communicable diseases among primary healthcare attenders in the Western Cape, South Africa. South African Medical Journal.
Health and Medical Publishing Group; Sep 21; 8 Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus.
Springer Nature; ;12 1 [. Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Huber J, Haak T. The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire DSMQ : development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. Springer Nature; ;11 1 Sprague MA, Shultz JA, Branen LJ. Understanding patient experiences with goal setting for diabetes self-management after diabetes education. May J.
Chronic poverty and older people in South Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal. Nabalamba A, Chikoko M. Aging population challenges in Africa. African Development Bank, Chief Economist Complex; World report on ageing and health.
World Health Organisation; Oct Bai Y-L, Chiou C-P, Chang Y-Y. Self-care behaviour and related factors in older people with Type 2 diabetes.
Journal of Clinical Nursing. Wiley; Dec;18 23 — Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. SAGE Publications; Apr;30 2 — Tang TS, Brown MB, Funnell MM, Anderson RM.
social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Ploeg HM van der, Ader HJ, Heine RJ.
Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. PsycEXTRA Dataset. Palaian S, Acharya LD, Rao PGM, Shankar PR, Nair NM, Nair NP. Knowledge, attitude, and practice outcomes: evaluating the impact of counseling in hospitalized diabetic patients in India.
Bashir A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of type 2 diabetic patients—a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Advanced Research [Internet]. International Journal of Advanced Research; Sep 30;6 10 — Okonta HI, Ikombele JB, Ogunbanjo GA.
Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding lifestyle modification in type 2 diabetic patients. Ambigapathy R, Ambigapathy S, Ling HM. A knowledge, attitude and practice KAP study of diabetes mellitus among patients attending Klinik Kesihatan Seri Manjung.
NCD Malaysia. Ng SH, Waseem AN, Kadirvelu A. Reality vs illusion: knowledge, attitude and practice among diabetic patients. Mukhopadhyay P, Paul B, Das D, Sengupta N, Majumder R. Perceptions and practices of type 2 diabetics: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata.
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. Springer Nature; ;30 3 Gautam A, Bhatta DN, Aryal UR. Diabetes related health knowledge, attitude and practice among diabetic patients in Nepal.
BMC Endocrine Disorders. Springer Nature; Jun 5;15 1. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and Validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. SAGE Publications; Jun;19 2 — Sue Kirkman M, Briscoe VJ, Clark N, Florez H, Haas LB, Halter JB, et al.
Diabetes in older adults: a consensus report. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [Internet]. Wiley; Oct 25;60 12 — George D. IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step. Goudge J, Gilson L, Russell S, Gumede T, Mills A.
Affordability, availability and acceptability barriers to health care for the chronically ill: Longitudinal case studies from South Africa. Springer Nature; May 9;9 1. Sinclair AJ, Barnett AH. Special needs of elderly diabetic patients BMJ; May 1; — Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ, Hilton L, et al.
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine. American College of Physicians; Sep 20; 6 Havemann R, Van der Berg S.
The demand for health care in South Africa. Studies in Economics and Econometrics. Skinner TC, Carey ME, Cradock S, Dallosso HM, Daly H, Davies MJ, et al.
Diabetic Medicine. Wiley; Aug 29;25 9 — Sinclair AJ, Girling AJ, Bayer AJ. Cognitive dysfunction in older subjects with diabetes mellitus: impact on diabetes self-management and use of care services.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. Elsevier BV; Dec;50 3 — Fox C, Kilvert A. Diabetes Education in the Elderly. Diabetes in Old Age.
Reeves D. Gallant M. Tol A, Baghbanian A, Rahimi A, Shojaeizadeh D, Mohebbi B, Majlessi F. The relationship between perceived social support from family and diabetes control among patients with diabetes type 1 and type 2. J Diabetes Metab Disord. Sinclair AJ, Paolisso G, Castro M, Bourdel-Marchasson I, Gadsby R, Rodriguez Mañas L.
European Diabetes Working Party for Older People clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Executive summary. Elsevier BV; Nov; S27—S Connell CM, Fisher EB Jr, Houston CA.
Relationships among social support, diabetes outcomes, and morale for older men and women. Journal of Aging and Health. Weaver LJ, Hadley C. Steinsbekk A. A systematic review with meta-analysis, BMC Health Serv.
Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Fischl AH, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Moore AR, Prybutok V, Ta A, Amey F. Personal social networks and health among aging adults in Agincourt, South Africa: A multidimensional approach.
Social Networks. Elsevier BV; Oct; — Westaway MS, Seager JR, Rheeder P, Van Zyl DG. The effects of social support on health, well-being and management of diabetes mellitus: a black South African perspective.
Social cohesion actions facilitate the goal of keeping the society united, not only through social relations, community ties, and intergroup harmony but also through reducing bias and discrimination toward economically disadvantaged groups within a society, such as women and ethnic minorities Categories include emotional support, tangible support, informational support, and companionship — Social support is theorized to operate by either buffering the effects of poor health or by directly impacting health , A systematic review by Flôr et al.
However, the few studies available and variations among populations and measures limit the ability to draw firm conclusions related to dimensions of social capital and whether the association is the same at the individual or neighborhood level , — Gebreab et al.
Studies demonstrating the relationship between social support and diabetes have associated increased social support with better glycemic control and improved quality of life — , while lack of social support has been associated with increased mortality and diabetes-related complications A number of studies suggest social cohesion, social capital, and social support may influence—or be influenced by—racism and discrimination Racism interacts with other social entities, creating a set of dynamic, interdependent components that reinforce each other, sustaining racial inequities and promoting both institutional- and individual-level discrimination across various sectors of society impacting diabetes incidence , For example, Whitaker et al.
Further work is needed to understand the multiple ways that the social environment influences inequities in diabetes outcomes. To our knowledge, there is no empirical research on social capital or social cohesion interventions and impact on diabetes outcomes, but a body of literature has examined effects of social support.
The systematic review by Strom and Egede of 18 observational studies of adults with T2DM found that higher levels of social support were associated with outcomes including better glycemic control, knowledge, treatment adherence, quality of life, diagnosis awareness and acceptance, and stress reduction Lack of social support has been linked with increased mortality and diabetes-related complications in T2DM , With regard to preferences—in a study conducted before the coronavirus disease pandemic—Sarkar et al.
Reliance on support from family and community tended to be higher in minority populations, while Whites relied more on media and health care professionals International and U. national committees have convened to provide guidance on SDOH intervention approaches.
These expert committee recommendations are not specific to any disease; rather, they are applicable to all conditions and populations of health inequity. Table 3 displays recommendations from the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health 27 , the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine NASEM formerly, Institute of Medicine Committee on the Recommended Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures for Electronic Health Records 80 , the NASEM Committee on Educating Health Professionals to Address the Social Determinants of Health , and the NASEM Committee on Integrating Social Needs Care into the Delivery of Health Care to Improve the Nation's Health 5.
The WHO recommendations are unique in their emphasis on root-cause, multisector interventions designed to remove the SDOH as a barrier to health equity. The NASEM recommendations are based in the health care sector and, collectively, focus on integration of SDOH into the health care mission, operations, and financial model.
Many health care systems are utilizing electronic medical records and health information exchanges to capture SDOH data and commercially available SDOH algorithms to identify patients at social risk and trigger service referrals NASEM provided assessment questions to capture SDOH domains and frequencies for assessment with evidence of feasibility Examples of resources on SDOH available for health care organizations and health care professionals.
There is SDOH evidence supporting associations of SES, neighborhood and physical environment, food environment, health care, and social context with diabetes-related outcomes. Inequities in living and working conditions and the environments in which people reside have a direct impact on biological and behavioral outcomes associated with diabetes prevention and control 12 , Life-course exposure based on the length of time one spends living in resource-deprived environments—defined by poverty, lack of quality education, or lack of health care—significantly impacts disparities in diabetes risk, diagnosis, and outcomes 12 , 48 , Although the review reports SDOH intervention studies for aspects of housing, built and food environment, and health care, there appears to be relatively limited U.
A clinical context alone, however, is too narrow to accommodate systemic SDOH influences. Structural and legal interventions are needed to address root causes driving SDOH 27 , Similarly, additional emphasis is needed on a next generation of research that prioritizes interventions impacting the root causes of diabetes inequities, rather than compensatory interventions assisting the individual to adapt to inequities 18 , For example, in the U.
antiliteracy laws for Blacks, which prohibited Blacks from being taught to read or write, persisted until the s in some states , , and laws prohibiting African Americans from attending public and private schools Whites attended continued until and , respectively Although adapting health materials for low-literacy suitability is an effective intervention to compensate for centuries of legal racial discrimination in educational access and quality, a next-generation intervention might target the education sector and implement delivery of high-quality early education to all within both the public and private school systems and with equitable educational funding for sociodemographic populations.
Similarly, while partnerships to bring bags of healthy groceries to low-income families living in food deserts are important to compensate for food deserts, a next-generation approach might target historical redlining and zoning policies that are the root cause of absence of supermarkets and fresh food markets in minority and lower-income neighborhoods — The review has limitations.
First, the undertaking was designed to summarize literature on the range of SDOH identified as having impact on diabetes outcomes. As such, this article describes findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as more recent published studies on the named SDOH; it was not designed as a primary systematic review of all published research on the topic.
Second are limitations of the research itself, including wide variability in measures and definitions used in studies within an SDOH area, making it more difficult to describe outcomes for an SDOH area in a consistent or uniform manner or to report quantitative outcomes derived from meta-analyses.
Third, this review was U. Finally, the many complexities of SDOH and their potentially different pathways and impacts on populations are beyond the scope of this initial review and require attention to specificity in designs of future SDOH research in diabetes.
Recommendations for SDOH research in diabetes resulting from this SDOH review are described in Table 5 and include establishing consensus SDOH definitions and metrics, designing studies to examine specificities based on populations, prioritizing next-generation interventions, embedding SDOH context within dissemination and implementation science in diabetes, and training researchers in methodological techniques for future SDOH intervention studies.
By addressing these critical elements, there is potential for progress to be realized in achieving greater health equity in diabetes and across health outcomes that are socially determined. See accompanying articles, pp. The authors express appreciation to Malaika I.
Hill and Mindy Saraco of the American Diabetes Association; Elizabeth A. Vrany, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Shelly Johnson, Washington University in St.
Louis, for providing technical assistance for this review. is supported in part by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research ICTR , which is funded in part by grant UL1TR from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences NCATS , a component of the National Institutes of Health NIH and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.
is also supported in part by NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute NHLBI grant T32HL is supported in part by NIH National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases NIDDK grant P30DK is supported in part by NIH and NIDDK grant P30DK is supported in part by NHLBI grant R01HL is supported in part by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grants P42ES and P30ES is supported in part by NIDDK grant K23DK The findings and conclusion in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Johns Hopkins ICTR, NCATS, NIH, NIDDK, or any other institution mentioned in the article.
Duality of Interest. received personal fees for service on an advisory board about prioritizing food insecurity research topics for the Aspen Institute.
No other potential conflicts of interests relevant to this article were reported. Author Contributions. researched data and wrote the manuscript. researched data and contributed to writing the manuscript. Sign In or Create an Account. Search Dropdown Menu. header search search input Search input auto suggest.
filter your search All Content All Journals Diabetes Care. Advanced Search. User Tools Dropdown. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Close navigation menu Article navigation.
Volume 44, Issue 1. Previous Article Next Article. Definitions of Health Disparities, Health Equity, and SDOH. SDOH Nomenclatures and Contextual Factors. Review of SDOH and Diabetes. Linkages Across Health Care and Community Sectors to Address SDOH.
Article Information. Article Navigation. Scientific Review November 02 Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review Felicia Hill-Briggs ; Felicia Hill-Briggs. Corresponding author: Felicia Hill-Briggs, fbriggs3 jhmi. This Site. Google Scholar. Nancy E. Adler ; Nancy E.
Seth A. Berkowitz Marshall H. Chin ; Marshall H. Tiffany L. Gary-Webb ; Tiffany L. Ana Navas-Acien ; Ana Navas-Acien. Pamela L. Thornton ; Pamela L. Debra Haire-Joshu Debra Haire-Joshu. Louis, St. Louis, MO. Diabetes Care ;44 1 — Article history Received:.
Connected Content. A commentary has been published: Social Determinants of Health and Structural Inequities—Root Causes of Diabetes Disparities. A commentary has been published: A Lesson From Public Health Matters for Both COVID and Diabetes.
A commentary has been published: Metabolic Syndrome and COVID Mortality Among Adult Black Patients in New Orleans. Get Permissions. toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu. toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest.
Table 1 Definitions. Health disparities adversely affect groups of people who have systematically experienced greater obstacles to health based on their racial or ethnic group; religion; socioeconomic status; sex; age; mental health; cognitive, sensory, or physical disability; sexual orientation or gender identity; geographic location; or other characteristics historically linked to discrimination or exclusion Health equity Equity is the absence of avoidable, unfair, or remediable differences among groups of people, whether those groups are defined socially, economically, demographically, or geographically or by other means of stratification.
Health equity is attainment of the highest level of health for all people. Achieving health equity requires valuing everyone equally with focused and ongoing societal efforts to address avoidable inequalities, historical and contemporary injustices, and the elimination of health and health care disparities Social determinants of health SDOH The social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age.
These circumstances are shaped by the distribution of money, power, and resources at global, national, and local levels. The social determinants of health are mostly responsible for health inequities—the unfair and avoidable differences in health status seen within and between countries View Large.
Figure 1. View large Download slide. Table 2 SDOH and component factors included in the diabetes review. Socioeconomic status. Neighborhood and physical environment. Food environment. Health care. Social context. Education Housing Food security Access Social cohesion Social capital Social support Income Built environment Food access Affordability Quality Occupation Toxic environmental exposures Food availability.
Table 3 SDOH intervention recommendations from international and national U. Recommended actions. Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, WHO 27 Improve daily living conditions Put major emphasis on early childhood education and development.
Improve living and working conditions. Create social protection policy supportive of all. Tackle the inequitable distribution of power, money, and resources Create a strong public sector that is committed, capable, and adequately financed.
Ensure legitimacy, space, and support for civil society, for an accountable private sector, and for the public to agree to reinvestment in collective action. Measure and understand the problem and assess the impact of action Acknowledge there is a problem.
Ensure that health inequity is measured. Develop national and global health equity surveillance systems for routine monitoring of health inequity and the social determinants of health.
Evaluate the health equity impact of policy and action. Ensure stronger focus on social determinants in public health research. Prepare health professionals to take action on SDOH To prepare health professionals to take action on the social determinants of health in, with, and across communities, health professional and educational associations and organizations at the global, regional, and national levels should apply [frameworks for] partnering with communities to increase the inclusivity and diversity of the health professional student body and faculty.
Integrate SDOH into organizational mission and values Governments and individual ministries e. Build the evidence base for SDOH learning, intervention, and evaluation approaches Governments, health professional and educational associations and organizations, and community organizations should use [a social determinants] framework and model to guide and support evaluation research aimed at identifying and illustrating effective approaches for learning about the social determinants of health in and with communities while improving health outcomes, thereby building the evidence base.
Committee on Integrating Social Needs Care Into the Delivery of Health Care to Improve the Nation's Health, NASEM 5 Design health care delivery to integrate social care into health care, guided by the five health care system activities—awareness, adjustment, assistance, alignment, and advocacy Establish organizational commitment to addressing disparities and health-related social needs.
Incorporate strategies for screening and assessing for social risk factors and needs. Incorporate social risk into care decisions using patient-centered care. Establish linkages between health care and social service providers.
Include social care workers in team care. Develop infrastructure for care integration, including financing of referral relationships with select social providers.
Build a workforce to integrate social care into health care delivery Social workers and other social care workforces should be providers eligible for reimbursement from payers. Integrate SDOH competencies in medical and health professional credentialing.
Develop a digital infrastructure that is interoperable between health care and social care organizations Establish ACA-recommended digital infrastructure for social care.
The Office of the National Coordinator should support identification of interoperable, secure, platforms for use across health and social care communities. The Federal Health Information Technology Coordinating Committee should facilitate data sharing across domains e.
Analytic and technology implementation must have an explicit focus on equity to avoid unintended consequences such as perpetuation or aggravation of discrimination, bias, and marginalization. Finance the integration of health care and social care CMS should define and use flexibility in what social care constitutes Medicaid-covered services.
Health systems, payers, and governments should consider collective financing to spread risk and create shared returns on investments in social care. Health systems subject to community benefit regulations should comply with those regulations and should align their hospital licensing requirements and public reporting with community benefits regulations and should link their community benefits providing social care.
Fund, conduct, and translate research and evaluation on the effectiveness and implementation of social care practices in health care settings Federal e. CMS should fully finance independent state waiver evaluations to ensure robust evaluation of social care and health care integration pilot programs and dissemination.
Table 4 Examples of resources on SDOH available for health care organizations and health care professionals. htm National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine Questions for conducting social and behavioral determinant assessment and frequencies for assessing Adler NE, Stead WW. Patients in context—EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health.
N Engl J Med ;— DOI: Kind AJH, Buckingham W. Making neighborhood disadvantage metrics accessible: the neighborhood atlas. html American College of Physicians Addressing Social Determinants to Improve Patient Care and Promote Health Equity: An American College of Physicians Position Paper.
HealthLeads: A nonprofit offering tools, training and resources for integrating SDOH into accountable care Aunt Bertha: A service that provides links to hundreds of programs serving every U. zip code. Free basic use. Table 5 SDOH and diabetes research recommendations.
Research recommendation 1 Consensus is needed around language and metrics associated with SDOH and diabetes care that move beyond health care and capture the impact of social advantage and disadvantage in population settings. Clarity and consistency in measurement, evaluation, and reporting of progress will allow for appropriate planning of interventions, allocation of resources, and analysis of impact in achieving equity goals.
Establish consensus core SDOH definitions and metrics Research recommendation 2 Examinations of potential differences in pathways or impacts of SDOH based on characteristics including diabetes type or diagnostic category e. T2DM, gestational diabetes mellitus, prediabetes , age group e.
middle class vs. poor are needed. Examine specificities in SDOH pathways and impacts among different populations with diabetes Research recommendation 3 Multisector partnerships, comprising academic institutions, government sectors e.
Priorities need to move from compensatory to the next-generation of research that will be larger in scope, addressing foundational causes of disparities e. Complex studies, examining the interactive effects of multifaceted systems that influence SDOH, will also transform and move translational efforts toward large-scale solutions that promote equity for all populations and mitigate the influence of SDOH on diabetes outcomes.
Prioritize a next generation of research that targets SDOH as the root cause of diabetes inequities Research recommendation 4 For clinical research programs, dissemination and implementation methods will shorten the translation gap from discovery to impact of evidence-based interventions by addressing the complexity of integrating and adapting evidence-based practices to real-world community and clinical settings.
This will assure all populations benefit from the billions of U. tax dollars spent on research to prevent diabetes and to improve diabetes population health. Use dissemination and implementation science to ensure SDOH considerations are embedded within diabetes research and evaluation studies Research studies must also consider the potential influence of either positive or negative SDOH e.
poverty, food security vs. insecurity, stable vs. unstable housing on intervention appropriateness and outcomes, on study recruitment and participation, and on study outcomes and conclusions.
Research recommendation 5 Training on SDOH and their influence on diabetes prevention and treatment is needed. Training priorities include interdisciplinary science, multisector collaboration research approaches, and methods to advance root cause research on SDOH. Additionally, increasing diversity among research workforces, and fostering educational experiences encompassing multisector partners will develop a workforce that is congruent with promoting diabetes health equity.
Train researchers in methodologies and experimental techniques for multisector and next generation SDOH intervention studies. Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors—an Endocrine Society scientific statement.
Search ADS. The CMS Equity Plan for Improving Quality in Medicare, September Accessed 25 October Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, and Office of Minority Health.
HHS Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: Implementation Progress Report National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Integrating Social Care Into the Delivery of Health Care: Moving Upstream to Improve the Nation's Health.
Council on Community Pediatrics. Addressing social determinants to improve patient care and promote health equity: an American College of Physicians position paper. Practical lessons for teaching about race and racism: successfully leading free, frank, and fearless discussions.
Acad Med. Accessed 7 June The case for diabetes population health improvement: evidence-based programming for population outcomes in diabetes.
Scientific statement: socioecological determinants of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Department of Health and Human Services. Section IV: Advisory Committee findings and recommendations. Phase I report, The science of eliminating health disparities: summary and analysis of the NIH summit recommendations.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Eliminating Racial Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Healthy People An Opportunity to Address the Societal Determinants of Health in the United States. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Foundation health measures: disparities.
World Health Organization. Health equity. Accessed 2 Februrary About social determinants of health, Accessed 7 February Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.
Geneva, World Health Organization, Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 Policy and Practice. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About social determinants of health SDOH. Accessed 14 August County Health Rankings Model, Beyond health care: the role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity.
Issue Brief, May Kaiser Family Foundation. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. Socioeconomic status and health: overview, methodological critique, and reformulation. Effects of race and socioeconomic status on the relative influence of education and literacy on cognitive functioning.
The role of early-life educational quality and literacy in explaining racial disparities in cognition in late life. Literacy in Everyday Life: Results From the National Assessment of Adult Literacy NCES — Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Disparities in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes — United States, and The geography of diabetes by census tract in a large sample of insured adults in King County, Washington, Mapping census tract clusters of type 2 diabetes in a primary care population.
Using neighborhood-level census data to predict diabetes progression in patients with laboratory-defined prediabetes. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, morbidity and diabetes management for adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.
Socio-economic status and HbA 1c in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inequalities in glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis according to socio-economic status and area-level deprivation in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.
Health disparities among youth with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of the current literature. The longitudinal influence of social determinants of health on glycemic control in elderly adults with diabetes.
National Diabetes Statistics Report, Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Contol and Prevention. Diabetes Report Card Association of socioeconomic status with mortality in type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study.
The role of health literacy in diabetes knowledge, self-care, and glycemic control: a meta-analysis.
Job insecurity and risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. The association of unemployment with glucose metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shift work and diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Long working hours, socioeconomic status, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from individuals. The Face of Diabetes in the United States, State of American Well-being, Diabetes rate greatest among transportation workers.
Gallup, Inc. Development and pilot evaluation of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD education in urban, diabetic African Americans. Health communication, self-care, and treatment satisfaction among low-income diabetes patients in a public health setting.
Health-literacy-sensitive diabetes self-management interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training on diabetes control in a low income patient sample. Addressing literacy and numeracy to improve diabetes care: two randomized controlled trials.
Diez Roux. Spatial context and health inequity: reconfiguring race, place, and poverty. Institute of Medicine. Capturing Social and Behavioral Domains and Measures in Electronic Health Records: Phase 2. Unstable housing and diabetes-related emergency department visits and hospitalization: a nationally representative study of safety-net clinic patients.
Housing instability and food insecurity as barriers to health care among low-income Americans. The association between housing instability, food insecurity, and diabetes self-efficacy in low-income adults. Our survey. McKinney homeless assistance act, Abt Associates.
The Annual Homeless Assessment Report AHAR to Congress; Part 1: Point-in-Time Estimates of Homelessness, January Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people.
Diabetes and hypertension prevalence in homeless adults in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Material need insecurities, control of diabetes mellitus, and use of health care resources: results of the Measuring Economic Insecurity in Diabetes study. Housing instability and health: findings from the Michigan Recession and Recovery Study.
Housing and food insecurity, care access, and health status among the chronically ill: an analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Housing insecurity and the association with health outcomes and unhealthy behaviors, Washington State, Housing and health inequalities: a synthesis of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at different pathways linking housing and health.
Diabetes care for patients experiencing homelessness: beyond metformin and sulfonylureas. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Interim Impacts Evaluation. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research.
The long-term effects of Moving to Opportunity on adult health and economic self-sufficiency. Effects of Housing First approaches on health and well-being of adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Changes in physical health after supported housing: results from the Collaborative Initiative to End Chronic Homelessness. Supportive housing and its relationship with diabetes diagnosis and management among homeless persons in New York City.
Built environment assessment tool manual, Accessed 9 March Evaluating causal relationships between urban built environment characteristics and obesity: a methodological review of observational studies.
Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity-related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments.
Built environment and cardio-metabolic health: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Assessing the relationship between neighborhood factors and diabetes related health outcomes and self-care behaviors. The influence of geographic life environments on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review, a methodological assessment and a research agenda.
The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning.
Do natural experiments of changes in neighborhood built environment impact physical activity and diet? a systematic review. The effect of changing the built environment on physical activity: a quantitative review of the risk of bias in natural experiments.
Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Environmental equity research: review with focus on outdoor air pollution research methods and analytic tools. Evolution of the environmental justice movement: activism, formalization and differentiation.
Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial-ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland. A new approach for inferring traffic-related air pollution: use of radar-calibrated crowd-sourced traffic data.
Multiple mediators approach to study environmental chemicals as determinants of health disparities. Environmental health disparities: a framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environmental health disparities in the Central Appalachian region of the United States.
Mining and environmental health disparities in Native American communities. Arsenic in groundwater in private wells in rural North Dakota and South Dakota: water quality assessment for an intervention trial.
Meeting the public health challenge of protecting private wells: proceedings and recommendations from an expert panel workshop. Private wells and rural health: groundwater contaminants of emerging concern. Overview of known plastic packaging-associated chemicals and their hazards.
A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, Dietary sources of cumulative phthalates exposure among the U. general population in NHANES Recent fast food consumption and bisphenol a and phthalates exposures among the U.
population in NHANES, The consumption of canned food and beverages and urinary Bisphenol A concentrations in NHANES The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern. Environmental chemicals and type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence.
Evaluation of the association between arsenic and diabetes: a National Toxicology Program workshop review. Role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and obesity: a National Toxicology Program workshop review. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, risk of type 2 diabetes, and diabetes-related metabolic traits: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Exposure to pesticides and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of persistent organic pollutants and non-persistent pesticides with diabetes and diabetes-related health outcomes in Asia: a systematic review. Phthalate exposure and metabolic effects: a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence.
Ambient air pollution and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between ambient air pollution and diabetes mellitus in Europe and North America: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic review and metaanalysis of air pollution exposure and risk of diabetes. Associations between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Exaggerated effects of particulate matter air pollution in genetic type II diabetes mellitus. Central IKKβ inhibition prevents air pollution mediated peripheral inflammation and exaggeration of type II diabetes.
Epidemiological and experimental links between air pollution and type 2 diabetes. Are diabetics more susceptible to the health effects of airborne particles?
Cardiovascular damage by airborne particles: are diabetics more susceptible? Individual-level modifiers of the effects of particulate matter on daily mortality. Impact of experimental type 1 diabetes mellitus on systemic and coagulation vulnerability in mice acutely exposed to diesel exhaust particles.
Diabetes enhances vulnerability to particulate air pollution-associated impairment in vascular reactivity and endothelial function. Air pollution and inflammation in type 2 diabetes: a mechanism for susceptibility.
Association between exposure to low to moderate arsenic levels and incident cardiovascular disease. A prospective cohort study. Effect of disodium EDTA chelation regimen on cardiovascular events in patients with previous myocardial infarction: the TACT randomized trial.
Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of reductions in emissions from major source sectors on fine particulate matter—related cardiovascular mortality. Declining exposures to lead and cadmium contribute to explaining the reduction of cardiovascular mortality in the US population, Leveraging health care communication channels for environmental health outreach in New Jersey.
Exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals in consumer products-a guide for pediatricians. General food environment resources, Accessed 10 July Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in stores NEMS-S : development and evaluation.
Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Food environment atlas. The food environment, its effects on dietary consumption, and potential for measurement within agriculture-nutrition interventions. Measures of the food environment: a systematic review of the field, Measures of the food environment: a compilation of the literature, Concepts and critical perspectives for food environment research: a global framework with implications for action in low- and middle-income countries.
A national study of the association between food environments and county-level health outcomes. Examining the relationship between the food environment and adult diabetes prevalence by county economic and racial composition: an ecological study. Neighborhood resources for physical activity and healthy foods and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
den Braver. Built environmental characteristics and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neighborhood social and physical environments and type 2 diabetes mellitus in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study.
Implications of supermarket access, neighbourhood walkability and poverty rates for diabetes risk in an employee population. Longitudinal associations between neighborhood physical and social environments and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis MESA.
Combined measure of neighborhood food and physical activity environments and weight-related outcomes: the CARDIA study. Associations of residential socioeconomic, food, and built environments with glycemic control in persons with diabetes in New York City from — Neighborhood price of healthier food relative to unhealthy food and its association with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Household food security in the United States in Economic Research Report No. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, A pilot food bank intervention featuring diabetes-appropriate food improved glycemic control among clients in three states. Treat or eat: food insecurity, cost-related medication underuse, and unmet needs.
Quantifying direct effects of social determinants of health on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Pathways between food insecurity and glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diet quality trends among adults with diabetes by socioeconomic status in the U.
Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis. Food preferences and coping strategies among diabetic and nondiabetic households served by US food pantries.
Food insecurity, processes of care, and self-reported medication underuse in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the California Health Interview Survey. Food insecurity and cost-related medication underuse among nonelderly adults in a nationally representative sample.
The relationship between food insecurity and depression, diabetes distress and medication adherence among low-income patients with poorly-controlled diabetes. Household food insecurity is positively associated with depression among low-income supplemental nutrition assistance program participants and income-eligible nonparticipants.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders in US adults with food insecurity. Chronic disease self-management within the monthly benefit cycle of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Food insecurity is associated with diabetes mellitus: results from the National Health Examination and Nutrition Examination Survey NHANES Material need support interventions for diabetes prevention and control: a systematic review.
Food insecurity is associated with hypoglycemia and poor diabetes self-management in a low-income sample with diabetes.
Food insecurity and glycemic control among low-income patients with type 2 diabetes. Low socioeconomic status is associated with increased risk for hypoglycemia in diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California DISTANCE.
Food insecurity is associated with diabetes self-care behaviours and glycaemic control. Comprehensive diabetes self-management support from food banks: a randomized controlled trial.
Published on prevntion. This is a member publication prevenyion University of Sheffield Jisc. Herbal remedies for inflammation Social support for diabetes prevention this article:. Social support for diabetes prevention Patients with diabetes may preventoon different needs according to their diabetes stage. These needs may be met via online health communities in which individuals seek health-related information and exchange different types of social support. Understanding the social support categories that may be more important for different diabetes stages may help diabetes online communities DOCs provide more tailored support to web-based users. Methods: Data were collected from one of the largest DOCs in Europe: Diabetes.
Dieser Gedanke fällt gerade übrigens
Ich meine, dass Sie nicht recht sind. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.
Wirklich, Danke
Riesige Danke, wie ich Sie danken kann?
Sie irren sich. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM.