Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy -
The Warning Letters explain that "No Hormones" and "Hormone Free" are false claims because all milk contains naturally occurring hormones, and milk can not be processed in a manner that renders it free of hormones.
FDA has stated that food manufacturers who do not use milk from cows treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin rbST may voluntarily inform consumers of this fact on their product labels or labeling, provided that the statements are truthful and not misleading.
Before the approval of rbST, FDA determined that the recombinant, or genetically engineered form of bST is virtually identical to a cow's natural somatotropin, a hormone produced in the pituitary gland that stimulates the production of milk. During that rbST approval process, FDA concluded that there is no significant difference between milk from treated and untreated cows.
For that reason, FDA also concluded it does not have the authority to require special labeling for milk and dairy products from rbST-treated cows, and that producers have no basis for claiming that milk from cows not treated with rbST is safer than milk from rbST-treated cows. I have no problem with natural, its the other stuff we give them.
I could drink milk, eat cheese, ice cream no problem untill about rbGH ish. Now if I have it I swear the stuff is trying to kill me from the inside. Not so with organic milk and amish cheeses, some imported cheese.
And good point on the antibiotics, not to mentian the seemingly early development of physically of some kids. We stick to the organic for DD, even her pediatrician said was a good idea.
Lisa loves Pooh DIS Veteran. Joined Apr 18, Just the same--I'd rather have nothing artificial in my dairy for my kids I don't eat dairy--blek! I don't sweat it if we are somewhere and they wish to have it--but ever since they were old enough to drink milk and eat yogurt--they have had organic.
I don't want them to have breasts when they are 6 and I have an aversion personal to dyes in food and prefer they not be consuming neon colored yogurt. We draw the line at organic cheese. Hubby consumes so much of it and the girls so little that I don't want to spend a lot of dollars on an ounce of cheese our choices here are limited for that.
We by the Vermont something or other cheeses since they sell cheddar cheese that isn't bright orange. I don't want them to have breasts when they are 6. They won't with the "artificial" stuff in dairy and to follow the logic, they won't sprout horns either or start chewing their cud.
If this were the fault of rBST, then any dairy products would have the same result. The more dairy your kids eat, the more bovine growth hormone they ingest. Joined Dec 10, Not all cows have it unless they are injected with it.
The non-organic milk may come from cows that have been given antibiotics to treat things like mastitis, etc. They probably eat feed that comes from fields that have been sprayed with pesticides.
I grew up on a dairy farm. Joined Aug 8, I'm sticking with organic! Sorry I don't buy geoff's info about the bovine growth hormone or the antibiotics - not going to risk my families heath.
I have no problem paying more for it. Not going to get into any big debate either - this is one issue where everyone has to decide for themselves - and it all ends up being a "we will have to agree to disagree". We rarely do cows milk - mostly organic rice milk - we do get DD organic choc cows milk occassionally for her school lunches.
I love the longer shelf life too! Joined Mar 14, you know the other alternative is just not to drink cow milk or drink it in limited quantities. that's what i do. i don't believe it is natural for non-babies to continue to drink milk after nursing. but that is a debate for another time.
The cows already have bgh, do they not--so adding it to them--gives them more, does it not? So drinking the same amount of milk -- what is it now glasses a day, would expose you to more bgh without any change in your consumption habits.
Free4Life11 DIS Veteran. Joined Apr 26, I had no idea milk was such a problem I probably go through a gallon of milk once a week!!
Does the organic milk taste different? I might buy some today. Free4Life11, You poor thing! You probably had no idea your parents were poisoning you all those years! Or perhaps if people want to take it a step further, they can do what one family we know does.
They only consumer "raw" milk straight from the dairy. They think that's the only healthy way to consume milk! Geoff: that's all well and good if you trust the FDA - some of us do not.
That is YOUR truth, but not necessarily THE truth. More research is needed to help better address these concerns. The effect of rBGH on human health is an ongoing debate, in part due to the lack of conclusive evidence.
A few of the most debated issues include:. Insulin-like growth factor 1 IGF-1 is a hormone found in humans that is responsible for growth promotion, protein synthesis , and insulin actions over the lifecycle. The hormone has been shown to influence the growth of tumors in some studies and may be linked to the development of prostate, [41] colorectal, breast, [42] [43] and other cancers.
IGF-1 is also found in milk. Previous research has proposed an increase of IGF-1 in rBST-treated cows, but this claim is currently not substantiated. In addition, no current evidence shows that orally consumed IGF-1 is absorbed in humans and the dietary amount is negligible when compared to what the body produces on its own.
The extent to which intact, active IGF-1 is absorbed through the human digestive tract remains uncertain. The American Cancer Society has reviewed the evidence concerning IGF-1 in milk from rBST-treated cows, and found that: "While there may be a link between IGF-1 blood levels and cancer, the exact nature of this link remains unclear.
But this same finding has also been reported in people who drink soy milk. This suggests that the increase in IGF-1 may not be specific to cow's milk, and may be caused by protein, minerals, or some other factors in milk unrelated to rBGH.
There have been no direct comparisons of IGF-1 levels in people who drink ordinary cow's milk vs. milk stimulated by rBST. At this time, it is not clear that drinking milk, produced with or without rBST treatment, increases blood IGF-1 levels into a range that might be of concern regarding cancer risk or other health effects.
IGF-1 concentrations are slightly higher to variable degrees, depending on the study in milk from cows treated with rBST than in untreated milk. This variability is presumed to be much less than the normal range of variation of IGF-1 in cow's milk due to natural factors, but more research is needed.
Research is supportive of milk supplying vital nutrients used in childhood development. Environmental triggers that may elicit an autoimmune reaction is the mechanism in which is being studied. Some studies have shown early exposure to bovine milk may predispose an infant to type 1 diabetes, whereas other studies show no causality.
The American Society of Animal Science published an article in after reviewing health issues arising from the rBST debate. The article indicated "there are no new human health issues related to the use of rBST by the dairy industry.
Use of rBST has no effect on the micro- and macrocomposition of milk. Also, no evidence exists that rBST use has increased human exposure to antibiotic residues in milk. Concerns that IGF-1 present in milk could have biological effects on humans have been allayed by studies showing that oral consumption of IGF-1 by humans has little or no biological activity.
Additionally, concentrations of IGF-1 in digestive tract fluids of humans far exceed any IGF-1 consumed when drinking milk. Furthermore, chronic supplementation of cows with rBST does not increase concentrations of milk IGF-1 outside the range typically observed for effects of farm, parity, or stage of lactation.
Use of rBST has not affected expression of retroviruses in cattle or posed an increased risk to human health from retroviruses in cattle. Furthermore, risk for development of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus has not increased in children or adults consuming milk and dairy products from rBST-supplemented cows.
Overall, milk and dairy products provide essential nutrients and related benefits in health maintenance and the prevention of chronic diseases.
Most of a cow's energy consumption goes directly towards milk production. In certain areas of the world, like Ethiopia where this was studied extensively, as the cows needed to intake more nutrition to balance out their milk production, there was also an increased level of chemical fertilizers and heavy metal traces found in the milk due to increased exposure to agricultural chemicals.
These chemicals can then easily be passed on to humans and lead to a contaminated milk supply. BST increases the longevity or the activity of the mammary cell leading to higher milk production and some other non-desirable side effects.
Despite public controversy of the use of growth hormones in food-producing animals, the number of violations has decreased substantially in the past two decades. Mammary health in the animals themselves has improved over this time period as well as the overall health of the dairy herd in general.
This is mostly attributed to better application methods of rBST and a better understanding of how the hormone affects the animals. On an industry level, supplementing one million cows with rBST would result in the same amount of milk produced while needing , fewer cows.
Some studies show that rBST-treated cows reduce the greenhouse gas footprint in comparison with conventional and organic dairy operations. Cady's study showed that excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus , two major environmental pollutants arising from animal agriculture, was reduced by 9.
In , the news division of WTVT Channel 13 , a Fox-owned station in Tampa, Florida , planned to air an investigative report by Steve Wilson and Jane Akre on the health risks associated with Monsanto's bovine growth hormone product, Posilac. Wilson and Akre alleged the firing was for retaliation, while WTVT contended they were fired for insubordination.
At the time of the decision, "the station claimed it did not bend to Monsanto's letter and wanted to air a hard-hitting story with a number of statements critical of Monsanto. Recognizing an uncodified agency policy developed through the adjudicative process as the equivalent of a formally adopted rule is not consistent with this policy, and it would expand the scope of conduct that could subject an employer to liability beyond what Florida's Legislature could have contemplated when it enacted the whistle-blower's statute.
Use of the recombinant supplement has been controversial. However, regulatory bodies in several countries, such as Canada, Japan, Pakistan, Australia, New Zealand, and Argentina, along with the EU, rejected Monsanto's application to sell rBST [16] [11] [62] because rBST increases the risk of health problems in cows, including mastitis , reduced fertility, and reduced body condition.
due to loopholes in the ingredient labelling system. In , the EU placed a moratorium on its sale by all member nations. It was turned into a permanent ban starting from 1 January ; the decision was based solely on veterinary concerns, laws, and treaties.
Canada's health board, Health Canada , refused to approve rBST for use on Canadian dairies, citing concerns over animal health. However, the board stated, with the exception of concerns raised regarding hypersensitivity, "the panel finds no biologically plausible reason for concern about human safety if rBST were to be approved for sale in Canada.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission, a United Nations body that sets international food standards, has, as of , refused to approve rBST as safe. The Codex Alimentarius does not have authority to ban or approve the hormone, but its decisions are regarded as a standard and approval by the Codex would have allowed exporting countries to challenge countries with a ban on rBST before the World Trade Organization.
Recombinant bovine somatotropin is an artificially synthesized form of the bovine growth hormone. It is legal for use as an artificial cattle lactation stimulant in several countries, including the US. However, its use is prohibited in most of Europe for reasons of consumer preference, animal well-being, and skepticism of new technology.
However, concerns of both product safety and livestock abuse have prompted discussions for new methods in assaying the levels of dairy cattle rBST. One proposed method involves quantifying the presence or absence of the rBST-binding antibody in serum. However, this method would require blood samples to be taken regularly and is thus considered by some critics [ who?
The development of other alternative methods continues to undergo development. One such example, tested by W. Thatcher at the University of Florida, [69] involves collecting milk samples from the cows and analyzing them directly for the presence of the rBST antibody.
Dairy cattle do respond to the rBST antigen and have shown positive results in immunosorbent trials on milk samples.
Tests involving pasteurized milk samples have even shown consistent results, with immunoglobulin rBST still detectable and distinguishable despite other antibodies remaining present. Research on the viability of this new technique, as well as many others, [70] as a means of monitoring the levels of rBST in dairy cattle continues to be an issue of practicality, profitability, and humaneness towards livestock in the dairy industry.
In , the product was approved for use in the US by the FDA, and its use began in The product is now sold in all 50 states. The FDA stated that food products made from rBST-treated cows are safe for human consumption, and no statistically significant difference exists between milk derived from rBST-treated and untreated cows.
The FDA does not require special labels for products produced from cows given rBST, but has charged several dairies with "misbranding" their milk as having no hormones, because all milk contains hormones and cannot be produced in such a way that it would not contain any hormones.
In , Ohio's Department of Agriculture ODA banned the use of labeling in dairy products as rBST-free because it was deemed misleading to consumers. However, the International Dairy Foods Association and the Organic Trade Association claimed ODA's ban was a violation of the first amendment by not allowing consumers to decide whether they deem the milk was safe and filed suit against the bill.
In , the Kansas Legislature passed a bill that would have required dairies that did not use rBST to print disclaimers on their labels that stated, "The Food and Drug Administration has determined there are no significant differences between milk from cows that receive injections of the artificial hormone and milk from those that do not.
The legislature removed the labeling language and passed the bill without the provision. In , Pennsylvania adopted a regulation that would have banned the practice of labeling milk as derived from cows not treated with rBST.
Pennsylvania's Agriculture Secretary Dennis Wolff made a statement in support of the measure. In response to concerns from consumers and advocacy groups about milk from cows treated with rBST, some dairies, retailers, and restaurants have published policies on use of rBST in production of milk products they sell, while others offer some products or product lines that are labelled "rBST-free" or the like.
Other dairies and industry groups have worked to assure the public that milk from rBST-treated cows is safe. In reaction to these trends, in early , a pro-rBST advocacy group called American Farmers for the Advancement and Conservation of Technology AFACT , [79] made up of dairies and originally affiliated with Monsanto, formed and began lobbying to ban such labels.
AFACT stated that "absence" labels can be misleading and imply that milk from cows treated with rBST is inferior. The International Dairy Foods Association has compiled a list, last updated in , of state regulations in the U.
for referencing use of growth hormones on milk labels. Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools. What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Get shortened URL Download QR code Wikidata item.
Download as PDF Printable version. Peptide hormone produced by cows' pituitary glands. This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.
There is no credible scientific evidence that milk hormones cause early puberty in children. A recent study found that regularly consuming milk was not linked to the age menarche starts for 9 to 14 year-old girls.
Other studies have also refuted this claim , suggesting that higher rates of childhood obesity in the United States may instead be responsible for earlier maturation.
Recombinant bovine somatotropin rBST , sometimes referred to as recombinant bovine growth hormone rBGH , is a synthetic version of the naturally occurring protein that helps cows produce milk. In fact, the majority of milk sold in stores is rBST-free.
The FDA and other leading health organizations have concluded that there is no significant difference between the milk from cows that are treated with the supplemental hormone rBST and rBST-free milk. Comprehensive research into milk safety has shown that there is no reason to be concerned about drinking milk from rBST-treated cows.
Hormones are never added to milk.
Horone-Free somatotropin or bovine Hprmone-Free abbreviated bST and BSTor bovine Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy hormone BGHis a peptide hormone produced by cows' pituitary Artificiall. Recombinant bovine Artificizl usually "rBST" Hormonw-Free, is a synthetic version Arrtificial the bovine growth hormone Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy Artificual dairy cattle by injection to increase milk production. Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy over its safety has Organic eggs benefits to it Treating under-eye bags banned in several countries, Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy Hormome-Free European Union Hormone-Fdeeand Canada, Japan, Pakistan, Australia, New Zealand, and Argentina, as it has been found to increase health risks in cows. The Codex Alimentarius has not approved it as safe. The FDA approved it inand required that any milk advertising that its cows were not treated with rBST include the disclaimer "The FDA has determined that no significant difference has been shown between milk derived from rBST treated and non-rBST treated cows". After the biotech company Genentech discovered and patented the gene for BST in the s, [4] it became possible to synthesize the hormone using recombinant DNA technology to create recombinant bovine somatotropin rBSTrecombinant bovine growth hormone rBGHor artificial growth hormone. Four large pharmaceutical companies, MonsantoAmerican CyanamidEli Lillyand Upjohndeveloped commercial rBST products and submitted them to the US Food and Drug Administration FDA for approval.Video
The HEALTHIEST Foods With No Carbs \u0026 No Sugar Thank Hormone-Fred stores, Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy, cost, Caffeinated energy drinks Artificial Hormone-Free Dairy Arfificial Remember Me Password [ Register ] Search Forums. Show Threads Show Posts. Go to Page Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members.
Nach meiner Meinung irren Sie sich. Es ich kann beweisen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM.