Video
L-carnitine in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular DiseaseL-carnitine and heart disease -
View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Bartels GL, Remme WJ, Pillay M, Schönfeld DH, Cox PH, Kruijssen HA, Knufman NM. Acute improvement of cardiac function with intravenous L-propionylcarnitine in humans.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Jul; 20 1 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Mancini M, Rengo F, Lingetti M, Sorrentino GP, Nolfe G. Arzneimittelforschung Sep; 42 9 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Pucciarelli G, Mastursi M, Latte S, Sacra C, Setaro A, Lizzadro A, Nolfe G.
Nov; 11 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Iliceto S, Scrutinio D, Bruzzi P, D'Ambrosio G, Boni L, Di Biase M, Biasco G, Hugenholtz PG, Rizzon P. J Am Coll Cardiol x Aug; 26 2 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Singh RB, Niaz MA, Agarwal P, Beegum R, Rastogi SS, Sachan DS.
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L-carnitine in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med J Jan; 72 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Kawasaki N, Lee JD, Shimizu H, Ueda T. J Card Fail;2 4 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Ferrari R, De Giuli F.
The propiony l-L-carnitine hypothesis: an alternative approach to treating heart failure. J Card Fail Sep;3 3 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Näveri HK, Leinonen H, Kiilavuori K, Härkönen M. Cause of limited exercise capacity? Eur Heart J Dec;18 12 a0 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Anand I, Chandrashekhan Y, De Giuli F, Pasini E, Mazzoletti A, Confortini R, Ferrari R.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Jul;12 3 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Rizos I. Am Heart J Feb; 2 Pt 3 :S View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Tarantini G, Scrutinio D, Bruzzi P, Boni L, Rizzon P, Iliceto S.
A randomized controlled trial. View at Publisher View at Google Scholar TD, Mohr FW, Khalimonchuk O, Weimer BC, Doenst T. Cardiovasc Res Jan 15; 85 2 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Serati AR, Motamedi MR, Emami S, Varedi P, Movahed MR.
L-carnitine treatment in patients with mild diastolic heart failure is associated with improvement in diastolic function and symptoms.
Cardiology; 3 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Xu XQ, Jing ZC, Jiang X, Zhao QH, He J, Dai LZ, Wu WH, Li Y, Yao J. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za; 38 2 PMID: [Article in Chinese]. View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Omori Y, Ohtani T, Sakata Y, Mano T, Takeda Y, Tamaki S, Tsukamoto Y, Kamimura D, Aizawa Y, Miwa T, Komuro I, Soga T, Yamamoto K.
J Hypertens View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Cheng L, Tang XF. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. PMID 20 [Article in Chinese]. View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Song X, Qu H, Yang Z, Rong J, Cai W, Zhou H.
Biomed Res Int; View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Moreira da Silva Guimarães S, de Souza Cruz WM, de Souza Weigert G, Scalco FB, Colafranceschi AS, Ribeiro MG, Boaventura GT. Arch Med Res;49 4 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Wang Y, Xu Y, Zou R, Wu L, Liu P, Yang H, Xie Z, Wang C.
Paediatr Drugs View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Shahidi M, Hashemi SR, Fattahi N, Roshani D, Vahedi S, Sharifi P, Moradveisi B. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Aug; 42 6 View at Publisher View at Google Scholar Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office.
The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help.
It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration. The Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I strongly recommend the amazing journal. They surprised us with their high efficiency in the reviewing process. It only took a couple of days for them to gather five high-quality reviews, which was incredible.
The editor office is patience and nice. The provided correct guide towards the payments process. I did not face many troubles when I was doing the international transfer. The articles published in the journal are very practical and interesting to the clinicians.
International Journal of Clinical Nephrology. We are very glad to say that the peer review process was very successful and fast. Therefore, we would like to continue our scientific relationship again.
Thank you very much for the editing of our manuscript. The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Dear Editorial coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Your review process was excellent, the support that I needed was perfect, the quality of the Journal appears to be very good. We will see the number and quality of the readers soon in Research Gate.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication.
I strongly recommend this Journal. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, As I wrote in one of my previous mail, work together with your Reviewers is always stimulating and gives me every time this is the second new sparks to improve my article.
Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
The article has been subjected to a peer review process, has been supported from the editorial office; the quality of the Journal is very good. I am delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the editorial office and the reviewer board.
The support regarding the modifications and publishing process from the editorial office were helpful and efficient. The peer review process and quality of the journal were excellent.
It was a pleasure to contribute with your Journal. The articles from this journal have an excellent scientific value.
I highly recommend your publication for the quality of all readings, and I am looking forward for new collaborations. The peer review process was very fast and qualitative. This journal is definitely a contributory one especially in the field of Pharmacy.
I wish the journal would excel with more laurels and get indexed in esteemed platforms. I'd certainly recommend this journal to my colleagues and offer support to review, in case needed. Shah Murad testify that Editorial team of Journal of Psychology and Mental Health Care helped me a lot.
I belong to a country where medical doctors earn few hundred US dollars per month, and face real hardships in daily life expenses. I requested editorial team of the Journal about my financial restrains and limitations. And they published my research article without claiming single penny.
Their peer review process was so fast and accurate, they published my article within 10 days. I testify worthful quality of the Journal. The editorial office provides a very prompt response from the peer review, editing, and galley proof to final publication.
Article formatting is also very impressive and presentable. Dear Erika Kato I would like to thank you for your helpful work, for your quick and accurate communication, and for your professional help throughout the process of my article. I got what I expected.
Thanks to the whole editorial staff. Mihály Fücsek. Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics".
The editorial team has been very supportive. Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience.
The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research peer review process was great, and great feedback to improve the paper for all of our readers from the scientific community.
The editorial office is supportive. The journal has highly qualified editorial board members, and high-quality papers are published regularly.
Testimonial covering: Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions The cooperation with the journal is absolutely smooth. All steps, from submission to publication, were well attended. Any questions that arose during the course were answered promptly. Peer review process is absolutely comprehensible, transparent and fast.
Criticism is constructive. Support from the editorial office and quality of the Journal excellent. I was looked after very well and professionally at all times.
Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues JWHCI. The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper.
I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
Dear Alexis Will, Editorial Coordinator of Dentistry and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Thank you for all and publishing. My word: « Publishing is at the heart of peer communication, science and progress. For a tremendous life effort in dentistry and gum cure domain, thanks to reviewers for their positive critic and contribution and of course Auctores kindness ».
According to your request, I inform that the journal's peer review process is very rigorous and pertinent; the editorial office chooses at least 8 expert pairs for each article, which is reflected in the quality of the articles and in the quality of the journal.
Unlike other journals, the publication process is fast and judicious. For the authors it is an honor that the articles are published in this journal.
Dt: This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
The review process was very helpful for me in order to improve the quality of my manuscript as well as accurate. I write this letter to testimonial and thanks for your warmly and efficient work.
In addition, the peer review is unique insights. Besides, I also want to thanks for the support from the editorial office, who's work is professional and strict production process. I wish Journal of Nutritional and Food Processing will operate more and more successfully in the future.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.
On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers. I believe that peer-review needs to be efficient, rigorous, and fair for everyone involved, and the peer-review system in the Cardiology Research and Reports journal, is simultaneously rewarding, with good suggestions for improving your manuscript often hidden among less useful comments, as the reviewer has a good back ground and did clearly read our manuscript.
Form my experience thru this journey three reviewers send their comments independently, followed by a final acceptance decision by the Editor-in-Chief. however, the process of my journal, peer reviewers are working in good faith and provide a critical service to the authors for the advancement of discovery worldwide, that is why we give them a thoughtful and thorough response.
Reviewers offer a fresh take on to our work and with few toning on some of comments that did contribute substantially to the shaping of the manuscript before our manuscript reaches a broader audience. At the end, as an author I did get the credit for the final product, and our experience with this journal is great.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal.
The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published.
The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage.
The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help.
They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful.
The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The Linus Pauling Institute's Micronutrient Information Center provides scientific information on the health aspects of dietary factors and supplements, food, and beverages for the general public.
The information is made available with the understanding that the author and publisher are not providing medical, psychological, or nutritional counseling services on this site. The information should not be used in place of a consultation with a competent health care or nutrition professional.
The information on dietary factors and supplements, food, and beverages contained on this website does not cover all possible uses, actions, precautions, side effects, and interactions. It is not intended as nutritional or medical advice for individual problems. Liability for individual actions or omissions based upon the contents of this site is expressly disclaimed.
You may not copy, modify, distribute, display, transmit, perform, publish or sell any of the copyrightable material on this website. You may hyperlink to this website but must include the following statement:. Linus Pauling Institute Oregon State University Linus Pauling Science Center Corvallis, Oregon phone: fax: email: [email protected].
For media contact information. Skip to main content. Toggle menu Go to search page. Search Field. Heart Failure. Nutrition Research Micronutrients Thiamin Vitamin D Dietary Factors L-Carnitine Coenzyme Q Linus Pauling Institute Oregon State University Reviewed in September by: John F.
RELEVANT EXTERNAL LINKS American Heart Association. Vitamins Minerals Micronutrient Inadequacies Other Nutrients Dietary Factors Food and Beverages Life Stages Health and Disease. Disclaimer The Linus Pauling Institute's Micronutrient Information Center provides scientific information on the health aspects of dietary factors and supplements, food, and beverages for the general public.
You may hyperlink to this website but must include the following statement: "This link leads to a website provided by the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University. Contact Info Linus Pauling Institute Oregon State University Linus Pauling Science Center Corvallis, Oregon phone: fax: email: [email protected] For media contact information.
L-cqrnitine research shows little risk heqrt Gut health and strength training Advanced pre-workout blend prostate biopsies. Discrimination L-carnitine and heart disease work is linked to high blood pressure. Icy fingers and toes: Poor adn or Raynaud's phenomenon? ARCHIVED CONTENT: As a service to our readers, Harvard Health Publishing provides access to our library of archived content. Please note the date each article was posted or last reviewed. No content on this site, regardless of date, should ever be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from your doctor or other qualified clinician.
Gott meinen! Also, und also!
Es ist der einfach prächtige Gedanke