What causes gynoid obesity? What potential health risks can gynoid obesity lead to? Gynoid obesity vs. android obesity. Frequently asked questions. How we reviewed this article: Sources. Medical News Today has strict sourcing guidelines and draws only from peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical journals and associations.

We avoid using tertiary references. We link primary sources — including studies, scientific references, and statistics — within each article and also list them in the resources section at the bottom of our articles. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy.

Share this article. Latest news Ovarian tissue freezing may help delay, and even prevent menopause. RSV vaccine errors in babies, pregnant people: Should you be worried?

Scientists discover biological mechanism of hearing loss caused by loud noise — and find a way to prevent it. How gastric bypass surgery can help with type 2 diabetes remission.

Atlantic diet may help prevent metabolic syndrome. Related Coverage. Rice and obesity: Is there a link? READ MORE. What are the effects of obesity? Medically reviewed by Angela M. Bell, MD, FACP. How to tell if you have overweight. Weatherspoon, Deborah, PhD, RNA, CRNA.

Everything Body Fat Distribution Tells You About You. reviewed Search Search. Browse Webinar Videos Press Releases PLC in the News Nutrition Medical News Getting Fit Corporate Blog.

Prev Previous Beyond Risk: How Your BMI Relates to Actual Cardiovascular and Total Mortality. Next Taking Statin Medication — Timing Can Matter Next.

Take Your Health to New Heights. Schedule an Appointment. Contact Us. Site Links. About The PLC Exam Corporate Health Contact Us. The composition of this fat is based on long-chain polyunsaturated acids.

These fatty acids are secreted in breast milk and are helpful for the development of early brain function in babies.

Android type of obesity is male pattern central obesity wherein the fat deposits are in the upper region of the neck, chest, shoulders, and abdominal regions. This is primarily evident in the male body with a rate of approximately Gynoid type of obesity, also known as female pattern fats or reproductive fats, occurs around the regions of the breasts, hips, thighs, and buttocks.

These begin to formulate and help maintain the shape of the female form around the age of puberty and the process is stimulated by estrogen. Android fats are caused due to genetic factors. Gynoid fats are present and are functional due to estrogen. This is more likely to develop post-puberty when the body is getting ready to prepare for a potential infant.

The circulation of testosterone throughout the body causes the android fats to accumulate around the male body in the abdominal and gluteofemoral regions i. the upper thigh and buttock region. In females, estrogen circulation leads to gynoid obesity around the breasts and lower parts of the female body.

Android fats and obesity are more prone to lead to the development of cardiovascular conditions — coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, diabetes, etc. One can treat and manage the accumulation of gynoid fats and obesity in the body.

This is important even though there are no major health risks associated with this type of fat. Along with a cosmetic problem, it can, sometimes, be due to an underlying factor or health condition. Proper diagnosis and treatment should then be taken.

Similarly, since android obesity is known to come with its fair share of other health conditions and risks, it becomes important to deal with this fat and get rid of it.

Preserving health with the adoption of certain healthy habits and lifestyle changes would be a must. Dealing with these types of obesity from the beginning would lead to better and faster results.

Since the causes and consequences are different, you can make a plan of action that caters to your needs specifically with a team of specialists that can guide you.

Ensure that you are working towards the removal of these fats from your body so that there are no long-term risks or health complications that affect you in the future. Stay healthy by adopting a healthy lifestyle.

Also know about blood sugar level normal. Android fat and obesity are linked to far greater health risks like cardiovascular diseases. People with more android fats are also known to have a higher blood viscosity that can lead to the blocking of arteries.

Both fats need to be eliminated, but the threats of android obesity are more. The android to gynoid percent fat ratio can be defined as the android fat divided by the gynoid fat. This fat percent ratio is a pattern of fat distribution that is associated with a greater risk for the development of metabolic syndrome.

Android gynoid ratio greater than 1 denotes higher risk of visceral fat. Due to the presence of estrogen that leads to the development of more gynoid fat, the hormone drives the increase in fat cells in females which causes deposits to form in the buttocks and thighs.

Contrarily, one of the most common types of obesity that are found primarily in males is android obesity. Fat deposition in this type is commonly around the center of the body — the stomach.

Several parameters can be used to compare these types of obesity that find a way to present themselves in adult males and females. Table of Contents. Obesity in the male android type presents itself dominantly around the visceral and upper and middle back or the thoracic regions of the body.

The fat is deposited around the central trunk region mid-section and stomach and can also include the chest and arms. Android obesity, since it sees fat in the chest and arm region of the body, can also be linked to insulin resistance.

This could mean that the body may not be able to transport and use the extra sugar and glucose molecules present for energy. Since the glucose is not used, it floats in the blood leaving the body susceptible to diabetes.

Android type of fat is also commonly associated with other medical conditions like heart diseases, hormonal imbalances, sleep apnea, etc. A strong reason for the association of different medical conditions with this type of fat is the high correlation of android fat with a high amount of visceral fat.

The more visceral fat, the higher the release of proteins and certain hormones that trigger inflammation in the body. This inflammation can damage arteries and can also invade our organs and affect the vital processes that they carry out each minute.

Gynoid obesity, on the other hand, is more commonly found in females. It can be characterized as a higher amount of fat accumulation around the hips, breasts, and thighs. A person who is obese gynoid type has a pear-shaped body.

It has different causes and health consequences as opposed to the android type. Females are more susceptible to developing this type of obesity due to the natural gynoid fat that exists in their bodies which aims to provide nourishment to the offspring. Gynoid fat can also be termed reproductive fat.

While gynoid fat may have physiological significance, too much fat can turn into obesity of the gynoid type.

One can also find this type of obesity in males, however, it is very rare. Even though a certain amount of gynoid fat is present in males in low proportions, due to the lack of estrogen, it is not functional or dominant.

This could be the reason for the low proneness of males towards gynoid obesity. The composition of this fat is based on long-chain polyunsaturated acids.

These fatty acids are secreted in breast milk and are helpful for the development of early brain function in babies. Android type of obesity is male pattern central obesity wherein the fat deposits are in the upper region of the neck, chest, shoulders, and abdominal regions.

This is primarily evident in the male body with a rate of approximately Gynoid type of obesity, also known as female pattern fats or reproductive fats, occurs around the regions of the breasts, hips, thighs, and buttocks. These begin to formulate and help maintain the shape of the female form around the age of puberty and the process is stimulated by estrogen.

Android fats are caused due to genetic factors. Gynoid fats are present and are functional due to estrogen. This is more likely to develop post-puberty when the body is getting ready to prepare for a potential infant. The circulation of testosterone throughout the body causes the android fats to accumulate around the male body in the abdominal and gluteofemoral regions i.

the upper thigh and buttock region. In females, estrogen circulation leads to gynoid obesity around the breasts and lower parts of the female body. Android fats and obesity are more prone to lead to the development of cardiovascular conditions — coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, diabetes, etc.

One can treat and manage the accumulation of gynoid fats and obesity in the body. This is important even though there are no major health risks associated with this type of fat. Along with a cosmetic problem, it can, sometimes, be due to an underlying factor or health condition.

Proper diagnosis and treatment should then be taken. Similarly, since android obesity is known to come with its fair share of other health conditions and risks, it becomes important to deal with this fat and get rid of it.

Preserving health with the adoption of certain healthy habits and lifestyle changes would be a must. Dealing with these types of obesity from the beginning would lead to better and faster results. Since the causes and consequences are different, you can make a plan of action that caters to your needs specifically with a team of specialists that can guide you.

Ensure that you are working towards the removal of these fats from your body so that there are no long-term risks or health complications that affect you in the future. Stay healthy by adopting a healthy lifestyle.

Also know about blood sugar level normal. Android fat is associated with cardiovascular risk more than gynoid fat. Track Your Body Composition, Not Just Your Weight.

Measuring body fat helps identify health risks and evaluate body composition. A weight scale provides us with a number signifying the weight of ALL our body tissues. Body composition provides us with percentages of body fat and lean body mass.

It is important to note that body mass index BMI and waist circumference WC do not assess body fat percentage. BMI is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. Understanding body composition is important to understanding weight loss.

The person could have a low body fat percentage, which would classify them as lean. Athletes are a prime example of this because they have more muscle mass.

And muscle weighs more than fat. It can assess our risk for obesity-related complications, but it still does not tell us the composition of our weight.

WC also suggests our increased risk for obesity-related health problems because of the location of excess fat — in the abdominal area where the dangerous visceral fat is located. Summary: Weight loss does not always come from fat.

Focus should be on reducing body fat percentage to build a leaner body composition. Lean body composition, not solely weight loss, should be your primary gauge of your physique. Body fat assessments vary in their precision and accuracy. Common anthropometric measures include: weight, waist circumference and skinfold measurements using skin calipers.

To measure WC, stand relaxed and place a cloth tape measure around the smallest part of the waist. More complex methods include: bioelectrical impedance analysis BIA , the BOD POD and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DEXA or DXA.

You should a methodology based on what is appropriate for you because each methodology has pros and cons. Skin Calipers: Quick and Easy.

A couple of bucks can get you skin calipers. This feasible skin fold assessment gathers measurements from a few body sites. Following a pinch of the skin, the thickness of the skin fold is measured using skin calipers. Measurements, with specific protocols, are taken from the chest, arm, abdominals and thighs.

The measurements are then plugged into an equation to estimate body composition. Body fat percentage can be determined within minutes, but the margin of error should be considered. This type of method requires accurate readings. It is suggested to measure from the same spots each time.

Fortunately with this measurement, a study found that using skin calipers to calculate total body fat percentage did not significantly differ from the value calculated using a portable ultra sound.

Yet, skin calipers provide regional body fat data because it does not measure deep belly fat. Therefore, it is a good relative measure of body fat.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BIA. BIA scales range from simple — a scale with electrodes under the feet - to complex — a handheld scale with electrodes. BIA relies on electric current that flows at different rates through the body depending on body composition.

The body also consists of body fat, or non-conducting material, which resists electric current and contains little water. BIA estimates body fat by measuring how easily the current moves through the body.

Body fat will resist electric current more than body protein. A voltage drop occurs in response to impedance. Following BIA measurement, predictive equations considering weight, height, sex and age estimate free fat mass. According to the skulpt website, the The technology behind the device is called electrical impedance myography or EIM for short.

In addition to estimating body fat, it uses a score called MQ to measure muscle quality, a unique measurement the company believes consumers should track.

The BIA approach to estimating body fat is more limited in evaluating body composition in individuals compared to groups. BIA has higher sensitivity and specificity for yielding average adiposity for certain groups of people.

Predictive equations for BIA have been developed for certain groups of various age groups for both sexes, including samples from Caucasian populations in the U. and Europe as well as African Americans and Hispanics. Therefore, the validity of these equations should be considered because it may affect the amount and direction of measurement error in BIA.

Another limitation to BIA is that it does not measure belly fat, the most dangerous fat. This is because electric current tends to follow the path of least resistance in the body. BIA measures free fat mass only, which makes it a less desirable body fat measurement tool for individuals.

During the assessment, the door will open and close for two second assessments. The air displacement calculates body mass, volume and density. The BOD POD estimates body fat, and InsideTracker's own Ryan Cohen is seen here getting his own composition tested.

Ryan is a very data driven fitness and health consumer. One study compared percent fat estimates between the BODY POD and DEXA. A significant mean difference of 2. The study could not determine what accounted for the difference. Also, as body fatness increased, the difference also increased.

Another study used 30 Division I collegiate track and field athletes to compare the accuracy of the BOD POD to skinfold measurements and DEXA. The percent body fat differed significantly between the BOD POD and DXA.

The percent body fat between the BOD POD and skinfold measurements did not significantly differ. There was a high correlation between percent body fat taken from the BOD POD and percent body fat taken by skinfold measurements. The percent body fat obtained from the BOD POD and from DXA had a poor correlation.

In conclusion, THE BOD POD and skin calipers produced similar results whereas the BOD POD and DXA did not. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry DEXA or DXA : The Gold Standard.

Results are quick as a single scan passes over the body while lying face-up on a table dressed in snuggly fit clothing. There are numerous benefits to DXA. DXA is considered the most accurate and valid body composition tool because it considers bone mineral content when estimating body fat and muscle.

DXA can accurately and simply assess the distribution of body fat associated with increased insulin resistance. DEXA is a suitable tool for measuring body composition in team sport athletes. A study using 36 professional Australian football players tested two consecutive DXA scans.

The DXA scan demonstrated precise measurements for fat-free soft tissue mass and bone mineral content. In comparison to skin calipers, DXA is the way to go. One study found that skin calipers significantly underestimated body fat percentage in women compared to the DXA.

The location of body fat is the most critical determinant of health risks rather than generalized adiposity — as seen with BMI and other body composition tools. The company DexaFit is already using DXA scans for their clients because it's the best option for body composition.

Adam Kadela, the DexaFit Co-Founder, expressed the value of having the best technology for evaluating body composition. Couple these merits with its three-compartment analysis and ability to display fat distribution by region -- specifically your visceral fat tissue -- and no other method can compete as a better benchmark for tracking progress and evaluating your overall health.

DXA scans are convenient ways to take control of one's health and performance, and offer the important connection of bone health as well as location of body fat, something no other option can do. Summary : Skin calipers are an accessible, cheap option for calculating body fat, but its inability to measure visceral fat is a major drawback.

BIA and skin calipers are good at predicting body composition. If BOD POD or DEXA are not feasible options, skin calipers can at least obtain a body fat estimation. What Should I Do With My Body Composition Data? Each measurement tool for body composition has its respective restraints, but each has an important outcome.

Dexa Fit Inc, Weatherspoon, Deborah, PhD, RNA, CRNA. Everything Body Fat Distribution Tells You About You. reviewed Search Search. Browse Webinar Videos Press Releases PLC in the News Nutrition Medical News Getting Fit Corporate Blog.

Prev Previous Beyond Risk: How Your BMI Relates to Actual Cardiovascular and Total Mortality. Next Taking Statin Medication — Timing Can Matter Next.

Take Your Health to New Heights. Schedule an Appointment. Contact Us. Site Links. According to the skulpt website, the The technology behind the device is called electrical impedance myography or EIM for short.

In addition to estimating body fat, it uses a score called MQ to measure muscle quality, a unique measurement the company believes consumers should track. The BIA approach to estimating body fat is more limited in evaluating body composition in individuals compared to groups. BIA has higher sensitivity and specificity for yielding average adiposity for certain groups of people.

Predictive equations for BIA have been developed for certain groups of various age groups for both sexes, including samples from Caucasian populations in the U. and Europe as well as African Americans and Hispanics. Therefore, the validity of these equations should be considered because it may affect the amount and direction of measurement error in BIA.

Another limitation to BIA is that it does not measure belly fat, the most dangerous fat. This is because electric current tends to follow the path of least resistance in the body. BIA measures free fat mass only, which makes it a less desirable body fat measurement tool for individuals.

During the assessment, the door will open and close for two second assessments. The air displacement calculates body mass, volume and density. The BOD POD estimates body fat, and InsideTracker's own Ryan Cohen is seen here getting his own composition tested.

Ryan is a very data driven fitness and health consumer. One study compared percent fat estimates between the BODY POD and DEXA. A significant mean difference of 2. The study could not determine what accounted for the difference. Also, as body fatness increased, the difference also increased. Another study used 30 Division I collegiate track and field athletes to compare the accuracy of the BOD POD to skinfold measurements and DEXA.

The percent body fat differed significantly between the BOD POD and DXA. The percent body fat between the BOD POD and skinfold measurements did not significantly differ.

There was a high correlation between percent body fat taken from the BOD POD and percent body fat taken by skinfold measurements. The percent body fat obtained from the BOD POD and from DXA had a poor correlation. In conclusion, THE BOD POD and skin calipers produced similar results whereas the BOD POD and DXA did not.

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry DEXA or DXA : The Gold Standard. Results are quick as a single scan passes over the body while lying face-up on a table dressed in snuggly fit clothing.

There are numerous benefits to DXA. DXA is considered the most accurate and valid body composition tool because it considers bone mineral content when estimating body fat and muscle.

DXA can accurately and simply assess the distribution of body fat associated with increased insulin resistance. DEXA is a suitable tool for measuring body composition in team sport athletes.

A study using 36 professional Australian football players tested two consecutive DXA scans. The DXA scan demonstrated precise measurements for fat-free soft tissue mass and bone mineral content.

In comparison to skin calipers, DXA is the way to go. One study found that skin calipers significantly underestimated body fat percentage in women compared to the DXA.

The location of body fat is the most critical determinant of health risks rather than generalized adiposity — as seen with BMI and other body composition tools.

The company DexaFit is already using DXA scans for their clients because it's the best option for body composition. Adam Kadela, the DexaFit Co-Founder, expressed the value of having the best technology for evaluating body composition.

Couple these merits with its three-compartment analysis and ability to display fat distribution by region -- specifically your visceral fat tissue -- and no other method can compete as a better benchmark for tracking progress and evaluating your overall health.

DXA scans are convenient ways to take control of one's health and performance, and offer the important connection of bone health as well as location of body fat, something no other option can do.

Summary : Skin calipers are an accessible, cheap option for calculating body fat, but its inability to measure visceral fat is a major drawback. BIA and skin calipers are good at predicting body composition. If BOD POD or DEXA are not feasible options, skin calipers can at least obtain a body fat estimation.

What Should I Do With My Body Composition Data? Each measurement tool for body composition has its respective restraints, but each has an important outcome. Acknowledge that the number on a weight scale may stay the same, but there may be changes in both lean and fat mass.

These body fat measurement tools combined with biomarker monitoring from InsideTracker are sure-ways of letting you know whether or not your diet and workouts are actually working.

Volek, J. Low carbohydrate diets promote a more favorable body composition than low-fat diets. National Strength and Conditioning Association. February 32 1. Bredbenner, C. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Geer, E. Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition and energy balance.

Gend Med. Donnelly, J. Effects of a month randomized controlled exercise trial on body weight and composition in young, overweight men and women: The Midwest Exercise Trial. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

LY and CX conceived the study idea and designed the study. LY, HH, ZL, and JR performed the statistical analyses. LY wrote the manuscript. HH and CX revised the manuscript.

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program YFA , the National Natural Science Foundation of China , and the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province C The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Chalasani, N, Younossi, Z, Lavine, JE, Charlton, M, Cusi, K, Rinella, M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

doi: CrossRef Full Text Google Scholar. Stefan, N, and Cusi, K. A global view of the interplay between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. PubMed Abstract CrossRef Full Text Google Scholar.

Riazi, K, Azhari, H, Charette, JH, Underwood, FE, King, JA, Afshar, EE, et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. Younossi, Z, Tacke, F, Arrese, M, Chander Sharma, B, Mostafa, I, Bugianesi, E, et al.

Global perspectives on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Kim, D, Konyn, P, Sandhu, KK, Dennis, BB, Cheung, AC, and Ahmed, A. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is associated with increased all-cause mortality in the United States.

J Hepatol. Peiris, AN, Sothmann, MS, Hoffmann, RG, Hennes, MI, Wilson, CR, Gustafson, AB, et al. Adiposity, fat distribution, and cardiovascular risk. Ann Intern Med. Nabi, O, Lacombe, K, Boursier, J, Mathurin, P, Zins, M, and Serfaty, L.

Prevalence and risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced fibrosis in general population: the French Nationwide NASH-CO study. Jarvis, H, Craig, D, Barker, R, Spiers, G, Stow, D, Anstee, QM, et al.

Metabolic risk factors and incident advanced liver disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease NAFLD : a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based observational studies. PLoS Med. Huang, H, and Xu, C. Retinol-binding protein-4 and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Chin Med J.

Guenther, M, James, R, Marks, J, Zhao, S, Szabo, A, and Kidambi, S. Adiposity distribution influences circulating adiponectin levels. Transl Res. Okosun, IS, Seale, JP, and Lyn, R. Commingling effect of gynoid and android fat patterns on cardiometabolic dysregulation in normal weight American adults.

Nutr Diabetes. Fu, J, Hofker, M, and Wijmenga, C. Apple or pear: size and shape matter. Cell Metab. Kang, SM, Yoon, JW, Ahn, HY, Kim, SY, Lee, KH, Shin, H, et al. Android fat depot is more closely associated with metabolic syndrome than abdominal visceral fat in elderly people.

PLoS One. Fuchs, A, Samovski, D, Smith, GI, Cifarelli, V, Farabi, SS, Yoshino, J, et al. Associations among adipose tissue immunology, inflammation, exosomes and insulin sensitivity in people with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Polyzos, SA, Kountouras, J, and Mantzoros, CS. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metab Clin Exp. Adab, P, Pallan, M, and Whincup, PH.

Is BMI the best measure of obesity? Manolopoulos, KN, Karpe, F, and Frayn, KN. Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health. Int J Obes. Karastergiou, K, Smith, SR, Greenberg, AS, and Fried, SK. Sex differences in human adipose tissues—the biology of pear shape. Biol Sex Differ. Bedogni, G, Bellentani, S, Miglioli, L, Masutti, F, Passalacqua, M, Castiglione, A, et al.

The fatty liver index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. Kahl, S, Straßburger, K, Nowotny, B, Livingstone, R, Klüppelholz, B, Keßel, K, et al.

Comparison of liver fat indices for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Cuthbertson, DJ, Weickert, MO, Lythgoe, D, Sprung, VS, Dobson, R, Shoajee-Moradie, F, et al.

External validation of the fatty liver index and lipid accumulation product indices, using 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy, to identify hepatic steatosis in healthy controls and obese, insulin-resistant individuals. Eur J Endocrinol. Ruhl, CE, and Everhart, JE.

Fatty liver indices in the multiethnic United States National Health and nutrition examination survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Tavaglione, F, Jamialahmadi, O, De Vincentis, A, Qadri, S, Mowlaei, ME, Mancina, RM, et al. Development and validation of a score for fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies. htm Accessed February Google Scholar. htm Accessed October National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies.

Matthews, DR, Hosker, JP, Rudenski, AS, Naylor, BA, Treacher, DF, and Turner, RC.

Android fats and obesity are more prone to lead to the development of cardiovascular conditions — coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, diabetes, etc. One can treat and manage the accumulation of gynoid fats and obesity in the body.

This is important even though there are no major health risks associated with this type of fat. Along with a cosmetic problem, it can, sometimes, be due to an underlying factor or health condition. Proper diagnosis and treatment should then be taken. Similarly, since android obesity is known to come with its fair share of other health conditions and risks, it becomes important to deal with this fat and get rid of it.

Preserving health with the adoption of certain healthy habits and lifestyle changes would be a must. Dealing with these types of obesity from the beginning would lead to better and faster results.

Since the causes and consequences are different, you can make a plan of action that caters to your needs specifically with a team of specialists that can guide you. Ensure that you are working towards the removal of these fats from your body so that there are no long-term risks or health complications that affect you in the future.

Stay healthy by adopting a healthy lifestyle. Also know about blood sugar level normal. Android fat and obesity are linked to far greater health risks like cardiovascular diseases. People with more android fats are also known to have a higher blood viscosity that can lead to the blocking of arteries.

Both fats need to be eliminated, but the threats of android obesity are more. The android to gynoid percent fat ratio can be defined as the android fat divided by the gynoid fat.

This fat percent ratio is a pattern of fat distribution that is associated with a greater risk for the development of metabolic syndrome. Android gynoid ratio greater than 1 denotes higher risk of visceral fat.

Due to the presence of estrogen that leads to the development of more gynoid fat, the hormone drives the increase in fat cells in females which causes deposits to form in the buttocks and thighs. Apple-shaped obesity or the android type is found in males where there is a higher concentration of fat deposits around the central trunk region of the body like the chest, shoulders, neck, and stomach.

This website's content is provided only for educational reasons and is not meant to be a replacement for professional medical advice. Due to individual differences, the reader should contact their physician to decide whether the material is applicable to their case.

Metabolic Health. Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity. Medically Reviewed. Our Review Process Our articles undergo extensive medical review by board-certified practitioners to confirm that all factual inferences with respect to medical conditions, symptoms, treatments, and protocols are legitimate, canonical, and adhere to current guidelines and the latest discoveries.

Our Editorial Team Shifa Fatima, MSc. MEDICAL ADVISOR. Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity Obesity is a common health condition and its prevalence spares no one.

Having deep knowledge of what might cause obesity in the female and male bodies will also be vital in removing the fats and moving towards a healthier body and BMI Proper medical terms are used to classify and categorize the types of obesity prevalent in males and females.

Table of Contents What is Android obesity? Weiss RDufour STaksali SE et al. Prediabetes in obese youth: a syndrome of impaired glucose tolerance, severe insulin resistance, and altered myocellular and abdominal fat partitioning.

Lancet ; PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Sinha RDufour SPetersen KF et al. Assessment of skeletal muscle triglyceride content by 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in lean and obese adolescents: relationships to insulin sensitivity, total body fat, and central adiposity.

Diabetes ;51 4 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Weiss RCaprio S The metabolic consequences of childhood obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab ;19 3 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Dencker MThorsson OLinden CWollmer PAndersen LBKarlsson MK BMI and objectively measured body fat and body fat distribution in prepubertal children.

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging ;27 1 16 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Daniels SRMorrison JASprecher DLKhoury PKimball TR Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. Circulation ;99 4 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Novotny RGoing STeegarden D et al.

Obesity Silver Spring ;15 6 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Caprio SHyman LD McCarthy SLange RBronson MTamborlane WV Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intraabdominal fat depot.

Am J Clin Nutr ;64 1 17 PubMed Google Scholar. Cole TJBellizzi MCFlegal KMDietz WH Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

BMJ ; PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Eisenmann JC Waist circumference percentiles for 7- to year-old Australian children. Acta Paediatr ;94 9 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref.

Glickman SGMarn CSSupiano MADengel DR Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity.

J Appl Physiol ;97 2 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Matthews DRHosker JPRudenski ASNaylor BATreacher DFTurner RC Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.

Diabetologia ;28 7 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Katz ANambi SSMather K et al. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab ;85 7 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref.

Uwaifo GIFallon EMChin JElberg JParikh SJYanovski JA Indices of insulin action, disposal, and secretion derived from fasting samples and clamps in normal glucose-tolerant black and white children.

Diabetes Care ;25 11 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Conwell LSTrost SGBrown WJBatch JA Indexes of insulin resistance and secretion in obese children and adolescents: a validation study.

Diabetes Care ;27 2 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Weiss RDziura JBurgert TS et al. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med ; 23 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref.

Invitti CGuzzaloni GGilardini LMorabito FViberti G Prevalence and concomitants of glucose intolerance in European obese children and adolescents. Diabetes Care ;26 1 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Gómez-Díaz RAguilar-Salinas CAMoran-Villota S et al.

Lack of agreement between the revised criteria of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance in children with excess body weight. Diabetes Care ;27 9 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref.

Paradisi GSmith LBurtner C et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of fat mass distribution and its association with the insulin resistance syndrome.

Diabetes Care ;22 8 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Bacha FSaad RGungor NArslanian SA Are obesity-related metabolic risk factors modulated by the degree of insulin resistance in adolescents?

Diabetes Care ;29 7 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Maffeis CManfredi RTrombetta M et al. Insulin sensitivity is correlated with subcutaneous but not visceral body fat in overweight and obese prepubertal children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab ;93 6 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref.

Taylor RWJones IEWilliams SMGoulding A Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged y. Am J Clin Nutr ;72 2 PubMed Google Scholar.

Carey DGJenkins ABCampbell LVFreund JChisholm DJ Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women: direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM.

Diabetes ;45 5 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Goodpaster BHThaete FLSimoneau JAKelley DE Subcutaneous abdominal fat and thigh muscle composition predict insulin sensitivity independently of visceral fat.

Diabetes ;46 10 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. Lemieux I Energy partitioning in gluteal-femoral fat: does the metabolic fate of triglycerides affect coronary heart disease risk? Eisenmann JCDuBose KDDonnelly JE Fatness, fitness, and insulin sensitivity among 7- to 9-year-old children.

Obesity Silver Spring ;15 8 PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. See More About Obesity Pediatrics. Download PDF Cite This Citation Aucouturier J , Meyer M , Thivel D , Taillardat M , Duché P. Access your subscriptions. Access through your institution. Add or change institution.

Free access to newly published articles. Purchase access. Rent article Rent this article from DeepDyve. Sign in to access free PDF. Save your search. Customize your interests. Create a personal account or sign in to:. Privacy Policy. Make a comment. This means your body will not be able to transport and use up extra sugar for energy, versus leaving it free floating in the blood Diabetes.

This can more readily support processes that cause heart disease, diabetes, hormonal imbalances, sleep apnea and more. The reason that we see so many more risk factors for disease in this type of fat storage can be because this fat directly correlates with a higher amount of visceral fat.

According to Dexafit. Pop Quiz: Which gender do you think carries their weight in this area, and experiences, generally, more of these more internal health signs?

This fat accumulates around the hips and buttocks. Individuals who hold their excess fat in this region tend to suffer from mechanical problems such as hip, knee and other joint issues, versus metabolic or hormonal issues. In addition, this distribution of fat actually has a negative risk factor for heart and metabolic disease!

Pop Quiz: Which gender do you think hold their weight in the bottom half of their body, and what sorts of issues do these people generally run into in regards to movement? The Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity. Are you an Apple, a Pear, or neither?

Android Vs.