Skinfold measurement for athletic performance -
A student-athlete with a higher body fat who drops a significant amount in a short time is at the same risk. Table 1 shows body composition ranges typical for collegiate student-athletes, based on skinfold caliper analysis.
These values should not be taken as recommendations or strict guidelines. Rather, they should be used as a reference point when evaluating body composition results. Every student-athlete is different and the recommended range for any specific individual may or may not fall within the range.
Table 2 shows compiled bod pod results from the to NFL combine. Note the variability of body composition by position played and also within each category. For example, running backs averaged As a greater rate of obesity, disordered eating and associated health problems are seen at the collegiate level, appropriate attention must also be paid to interventions for student-athletes above and below their target body composition range.
Working with a registered dietitian, particularly a board certified specialist in sports dietetics CSSD to design a nutrition plan is recommended. There are many different methods for evaluating body composition. There is no gold standard since some degree of estimation and error is associated with all methods.
Regardless of measurement tool chosen, if any, it is important that student-athletes be educated on the concept of body composition.
is extremely valuable. In the collegiate setting, numerous assessment tools are used. Skinfold calipers are common, accessible, inexpensive, and thus, commonly used.
The consistency and accuracy of results is highly dependent upon the individual conducting the assessment. Each of these methods has strengths and considerations for student-athletes and testers. See Table 3for more information about various testing methods. Body composition can be very powerful tool for enhancing performance and well-being and tracking changes when careful consideration is made regarding procedures, data interpretation, and communication.
Work with a sports RD to establish a body composition protocol that suits your student-athletes and staff. For advice on customizing an eating plan that includes a caffeine dosing protocol that is safe and based on current evidence, consult an RD who specializes in sports, particularly a Board Certified Specialist in Sports Dietetics CSSD.
Find a SCAN RD at www. Michelle Rockwell is a Registered Dietitian and Certified Specialist in Sports Dietetics with a private practice based in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Michelle is the dietetics and graduate program coordinator at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Michelle served as founding Sports Dietitian for the University of Florida and North Carolina State Athletic departments. She has also consulted with over 50 colleges and professional sports teams over the past 10 years.
Michelle continues to teach and develop educational resources for developing Sports Dietitians. The use of software that blocks ads hinders our ability to serve you the content you came here to enjoy.
We ask that you consider turning off your ad blocker so we can deliver you the best experience possible while you are here. Written by: Michelle Rockwell, MS, RD, CSSD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Body composition is a physical measurement that provides more specific information about body make-up than body weight alone.
Does body composition impact athletic performance and health? Assessing body composition There are many different methods for evaluating body composition.
Assessment tools and methods used with college student-athletes: In the collegiate setting, numerous assessment tools are used. Considerations about body composition analysis: A body composition measurement from one method cannot be compared to one from another.
For example, a football player evaluated by DEXA at his university cannot compare results to the BodPod values he receives at the NFL combine. Likewise, when tester or equipment variation comes into play, results also cannot be compared. A cross country runner who has skinfold caliper measurements performed by her strength and conditioning coach cannot compare results to the same measurements taken by the sports dietitian.
Measuring via the same method in a systematic way offers the most benefit for individuals and team analysis. Measurements should be done in private. Results should be handled with sensitivity.
The National Athletic Trainers Association suggests that body composition results be treated the same as other medical information with regard to confidentiality. Measurements should be taken when student-athletes are well-hydrated and before exercise.
In general, measurements should be taken no more frequently than every two to three months. Some professionals recommend twice per year or less. Defer to your sports dietitian regarding specific student-athlete protocols. There should always be a purpose for taking measurement.
Clear and consistent communication is paramount. Testers must be sensitive to the impact of assessment on student-athletes. If resources are not available to assist with the management of body composition information and education, its best to avoid it altogether.
Communicating about body composition Always emphasize performance measures, overall training, diet and healthy lifestyle as highest priority for athletes.
When body composition change is appropriate, establish a percent body fat range rather than an absolute value.
Changes in body composition should be gradual and targeted changes are priority in the off-season whenever possible. Guide student-athletes to focus on FFM as much as they focus on percent body fat as this is functional, powerful athletic tissue they wish to maintain or increase and can feel more positive than focusing on decreasing percent body fat.
It is recommended that athletics departments develop guidelines and protocol for measurement, analysis and communication of body composition data. Table 3. May feel intrusive to some athletes. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 12 3 , pp. Durnin, J. and Womersley, J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.
British Journal of Nutrition , 32 1 , pp. Biaggi, R. and Chen, K. Comparison of air-displacement plethysmography with hydrostatic weighing and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in healthy adults—.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition , 69 5 , pp. Gately, P. and Wright, A. Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese children. Journal of Applied Physiology , 95 5 , pp. Ginde, S. and Heymsfield, S. Air displacement plethysmography: validation in overweight and obese subjects.
Obesity Research , 13 7 , pp. Peterson, M. and Siervogel, R. Development and validation of skinfold-thickness prediction equations with a 4-compartment model. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition , 77 5 , pp.
Evans, E. and Arngrímsson, S. Skinfold prediction equation for athletes developed using a four-component model. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise , 37 11 , pp. López-Taylor, J. and Torres-Naranjo, F.
Accuracy of Anthropometric Equations for Estimating Body Fat in Professional Male Soccer Players Compared with DXA. Journal of Sports Medicine , Silva, A. and Sardinha, L.
Are skinfold-based models accurate and suitable for assessing changes in body composition in highly trained athletes?.
Shakibaee, A. and Asgari, A. How accurate are the anthropometry equations in in Iranian military men in predicting body composition?. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 6 4. and Falvey, E. Application of a sub-set of skinfold sites for ultrasound measurement of subcutaneous adiposity and percentage body fat estimation in athletes.
International Journal of Sports Medicine, 37 05 , pp. Application of a Sub-set of Skinfold Sites for Ultrasound Measurement of Subcutaneous Adiposity and Percentage Body Fat Estimation in Athletes. Müller, W. and Ahammer, H.
Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47 16 , pp. and Schwartz, S. A-mode and B-mode ultrasound measurement of fat thickness: a cadaver validation study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition , p. Civar, S. and Ayceman, N. Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance measurement in highly active males.
Biology of Sport, 20 3 , pp. Wilmore, J. and Behnke, A. An anthropometric estimation of body density and lean body weight in young men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 27 1 , pp. Reilly, T. and Wallace, J. How well do skinfold equations predict percent body fat in elite soccer players?.
International Journal of Sports Medicine , 30 08 , pp. Withers, R. and Norton, K. Relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of male athletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology , 56 2 , pp.
Suarez-Arrones, L. and Méndez-Villanueva, A. Deurenberg, P. and Seidell, J. Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age-and sex-specific prediction formulas. British Journal of Nutrition , 65 2 , pp. Faulkner, J. Physiology of swimming.
Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation , 37 1 , pp. Zemski, A. and Slater, G. Pre-season body composition adaptations in elite Caucasian and Polynesian rugby union athletes. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism , pp.
Longitudinal changes in body composition assessed using DXA and surface anthropometry show good agreement in elite rugby union athletes. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism , 20 XX , pp.
Aandstad, A. and Anderssen, S. Validity and reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold thickness in predicting body fat in military personnel. Military Medicine, 2 , pp. Nagy, E. and Moreno, L. Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in a multicenter study in adolescents.
International Journal of Obesity, 32 S5 , p. Lozano-Berges, G. and Vicente-Rodríguez, G. Assessing fat mass of adolescent swimmers using anthropometric equations: a DXA validation study. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88 2 , pp. Fonseca-Junior, S. and Pierucci, A.
Validity of skinfold equations, against dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, in predicting body composition in adolescent pentathletes.
Pediatric Exercise Science, 29 2 , pp. Santos, D. and Silva, A. Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes.
PloS One, 9 5 , p. Hume, P. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26 12 , pp. Ducker, K. and Hume, P. Best Practice Protocols for Physique Assessment in Sport. In Best Practice Protocols for Physique Assessment in Sport.
Larson-Meyer, D. and Burke, L. Assessment of nutrient status in athletes and the need for supplementation. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism , 28 2 , pp.
View Cart Checkout Continue Shopping. Link Text. Open link in a new tab. No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item. High inter-tester variability i. reliability can be poor when the tester does not remain the same.
Tor body composition in athletes is beneficial for many reasons. Skinfold thickness assessment is one of Metabolism and nutrition methods that can be used to accomplish Xthletic task. How skinfolds aathletic works, its popularity among sports professionals, how to pick the right equation to use, and sources of error are reviewed in this article. Grey boxes are summary points. Blue boxes give more detail about key terms or subjects. Anthropometry involves the measurement of body dimensions, which can include height, weight, length, width, circumference, and skinfold thickness [1].Video
How to Measure Body Fat Percentage (Male) - Skinfold Caliper Testing Nursing Skill Pfrformance to gain muscle mass or reduce your fat mass? Measuremsnt are Siinfold variety of measurements Energy-boosting ingredients tell you Skinfold measurement for athletic performance lot more information about Skinfold measurement for athletic performance Skinfolf than simple weight eprformance does, for example DXA scans, Bod Pods, BIA and surface anthropometry skinfolds. These types of measurements all come with their own unique set of errors and benefits with their estimation of physique. See the table below for a summary of the accuracy and reliability of different body composition assessments that can be undertaken:. At Precision Athletica, we primarily assess skinfold measurements.
0 thoughts on “Skinfold measurement for athletic performance”