Cite this article Khalid Ijaz, M. Step eetergent Laundry is Sanitized in Rinse Cycle. Product Catalog Brand Information Contact Us.

Anti-viral laundry detergent -

Thank you for visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer.

In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. We have explored the efficacy of laundry sanitizers for inactivating coronaviruses and influenza viruses. The use of a laundry sanitizer containing microbicidal actives may afford mitigation of the risk of contamination of surfaces during handling of the laundry and washing appliances i.

Laundry sanitizers have been introduced to commerce to enhance the bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of the clothes-washing process. It could be argued that laundry detergent, in association with elevated water temperatures, has sufficient microbicidal efficacy that an additional agent i.

There are several factors to consider, however, when addressing this issue. The clothes-washing process is complex, and consists of multiple steps capable of reducing pathogen load 1 , 2. These steps include: 1 removal, through the action of the detergent and the water rinse; 2 inactivation by the detergent; and 3 possible thermal inactivation by the water used for soaking and rinsing.

From a virucidal point of view, it may be assumed that detergent inactivation should apply primarily to lipid-enveloped viruses 3 , 4 , while removal should apply to all viruses i. Extent of thermal inactivation will be dependent upon the temperature of the water used for the wash and rinse portions of the washing cycle, and upon the target virus.

Usually, 40 °C or higher is recommended for eliminating bacterial and viral pathogens 2. Removal of non-inactivated virus simply transfers infectious virus from one location to another, possibly contaminating other surfaces and the waste-water stream 5.

The wastewater gray water stream may be reused in some households for landscape irrigation, flushing toilets or other purposes 8. Another consideration is that some types of clothing can only be hand-washed and, in some regions of the world, hand-washing of clothing is the only option available 9.

To reduce the risks from pathogens and for a higher level of assurance of interrupting the spread of highly pathogenic viruses via contaminating clothing and environmental surfaces associated with the clothes laundering process, the use of EPA-registered laundry sanitizers, surface hygiene agents, and hand hygiene agents may be warranted 10 , This is especially true during a viral outbreak such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus-2 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic now being experienced and the emergence of mutational variants with increased morbidity or transmissibility e.

A few marketed laundry sanitizing agents have been characterized as antibacterial. We were unable to identify reports of the ability of such products to inactivate viruses in general, or SARS-CoV-2, in particular. In the present study, we have examined the virucidal efficacy of a selection of formulated microbicidal active-containing laundry sanitizers against four enveloped viruses: coronaviruses, including the alphacoronavirus human coronavirus E HCoV E and the betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2 , and the orthomyxoviruses influenza A and B.

As mentioned above, there are multiple opportunities for dissemination of virus during the laundering process, and not all of these are addressed by the actual efficacy for viral removal and inactivation by the detergent and water-based washing and rinsing process.

Other risks may best be mitigated through use of additional hygiene agents, including possibly laundry sanitizers, surface hygiene agents, and hand hygiene agents 10 , Schematic view of the machine clothes laundering process, indicating possible risk points for enveloped virus accumulation and cross-contamination.

Virucidal efficacy testing against alpha- and beta-coronaviruses and influenza viruses A and B was performed for commercially available laundry sanitizer products per standardized hard surface and suspension methods.

Details on the challenge viruses and the host cell lines used for propagation of viral stocks and for in vitro cell-based infectivity assays are shown in Table 1. This table also indicates the culture media used for propagating the cells and the contract testing organizations that performed the virucidal efficacy testing.

The challenge matrix in each case was cell culture medium containing an organic load. The microbicidal active ingredient concentrations in the products as tested, contact times, exposure temperatures, and the organic loads evaluated, are each indicated in Table 2. Eight mL of formulated microbicidal active-containing laundry sanitizer, at concentration sufficient to achieve the final concentration listed in Table 2 , were added.

The resulting solutions were subjected to vortex mixing. Following the exposure periods, the test solutions were immediately neutralized by adding ice-cold neutralizing agent, defined in Table 2 , to stop the virucidal reactions. In certain cases, as indicated in Table 2 , the neutralized samples were passed through a Sephadex LH gel filtration column to reduce cytotoxicity to the detector cells used in assessing any residual infectious virus.

Virucidal efficacy evaluations of laundry sanitizers against viruses experimentally deposited on a prototypic non-porous surface glass were conducted per ASTM E The microbicidal active ingredient concentrations, contact times, exposure temperatures, and the organic loads evaluated are indicated in Table 3.

A brief description of the methodology follows: An aliquot of 0. The virus was allowed to dry at ambient temperature. The laundry sanitizer under evaluation 2. Neutralizing agent 2.

The neutralized test solutions were passed through a gel filtration column to reduce cytotoxicity to the host cells. The neutralized samples were serially ten-fold diluted in a dilution medium defined in Table 3 and inoculated onto detector cells to assay for infectious virus using the TCID 50 assay.

Virucidal efficacy data obtained from suspension inactivation and non-porous surface glass inactivation studies have been presented in terms of log 10 reduction in titer of the virus, with titers being calculated using a well plate cell infectivity assay.

Scoring for viral titer was based on viral cytopathic effect CPE in the host cell monolayers. Log 10 reduction in titer values have been obtained by subtracting the post-treatment titers from the corresponding positive control titers. Limits of detection for the detection assays applied in some cases, due to residual cytotoxic effects of the formulated microbicidal active-containing laundry sanitizers following neutralization.

Such limits of detection have been accounted for in determination of log 10 reduction values. Survival half-life t½ values of viruses on experimentally contaminated fabric articles were reported or have been calculated from the reported data for SARS-CoV-2 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 or influenza virus H1N1 20 , Biphasic linear regression plots log 10 titer vs.

The use of terminal half-life in such calculations in acknowledged to overestimate, to some extent, the times required for decay of the virus to levels lower than the ID These calculations, therefore, represent a more conservative approach than, for instance, calculations based on use of the initial t½ value or a calculated monophasic t½ value.

A human dose—response curve for SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been empirically determined, so an exact value for the human ID 50 has not been reported. The time required to bring the fabric virus burden to PFU i.

This calculation was performed, as an illustrative example, to put the survival t½ data into perspective. It is acknowledged that the assumptions made were not based on empirical data in humans. The human ID 50 for influenza virus has been estimated, based on human volunteer studies, to be in the range of 0.

The results indicate complete inactivation i. No lot-to-lot variability in virucidal efficacy was noted in these studies, which evaluated 2 to 3 independent product lots side-by-side under the same experimental conditions. Several studies of the survival persistence of infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 experimentally dried onto fabrics have been reported in the recent literature 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , The data sets have been generated by determining infectious SARS-CoV-2 extracted from the fabric after various time periods following experimental contamination.

The survival t½ values times required to reduce the virus titer by one-half were reported in the cited literature or were, in some cases 16 , 17 , 19 calculated from reported raw data to reflect biphasic or monophasic decay values, as appropriate to the reported data sets.

In some cases e. Studies of the survival persistence of infectivity of influenza virus experimentally dried onto fabrics also have been reported 20 , The viral persistence data are displayed in Table 4.

We attempted to put the survival data into perspective by estimating the duration of time needed for the infectivity of the viruses to decay to levels lower than an estimated human ID Once fabrics are contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 or influenza viruses, these data suggest infectious virus may persist on the fabrics for minutes to days.

While not displayed in Table 4 , data on the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza H1N1 on non-porous or porous surfaces have been reviewed recently 26 , The virucidal action of the clothes laundering process including drying in the electric dryer involves a combination of mechanical removal, microbicidal inactivation detergent , and possible thermal inactivation.

These occur even in the absence of added laundry-sanitizing agents. We are not suggesting or recommending, in the present article, that laundry sanitizers are required for sanitization of clothing contaminated by an enveloped virus.

These include appliance-operating knobs, clothes-folding surfaces, and even the operating controls and surfaces of drying appliances.

The potential of virus dissemination to these primary and secondary surfaces Fig. However, a more holistic approach 10 , 11 to interruption of viral dissemination during clothes laundering takes into account additional targeted interventions, such as surface and hand hygiene agents.

Laundry sanitizers in combination with higher temperature may also be useful for enhancing the efficacy of the laundry process for inactivating non-enveloped viruses 10 , 11 , although that possibility has not been addressed in the current studies.

In the studies described here, we have employed both suspension and hard surface inactivation methodologies. The suspension method BS EN 12 was used to model the inactivation of virus in the wash and rinse solutions generated during clothes washing. Organic loads were employed in the testing to challenge the viral inactivation, although, in practice, any organic load associated with the virus would be expected to be greatly removed or diluted during the soaking, washing, and rinsing process.

The hard surface method ASTM 13 involved drying of virus onto glass carriers to model inactivation of viruses dried on a hard, non-porous, surface, such as the metal tumbler of a washing machine, and transferred to and dried upon appliance door handles and operating knobs Fig.

The standardized method ASTM E 28 , though appropriate for evaluating the efficacy of a laundry sanitizer, necessitates the use of a laundry tumbler.

Such equipment is not normally available within a biosafety level 3 BSL-3 laboratory such as that needed for working with highly pathogenic viruses, such as SARS-CoV The question of survival of infectious SARS-CoV-2 on fabric has been evaluated previously.

The results, to date, are shown in Table 4 , and have been put into perspective by relating the survival t½ data to possible initial viral burden and an estimated human ID SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected on fabric articles pillow covers, duvet covers, sheets, and towels taken from the quarantine hotel rooms of two patients three h after being tested positive for the virus Similarly, the actual value of the ID 50 for SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be determined Having said this, the data in Table 4 suggest that SARS-CoV-2 contamination on clothing may remain infectious for hours, and in the presence of a soil matrix, may remain infectious for days.

Data for influenza viruses suggest that these also may remain infectious for hours on contaminated clothing. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory evidence is accumulating 33 that suggests that asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic SARS-CoVpositive patients shed infectious SARS-CoV-2 which can contaminate patient clothing, potentially cross-contaminating clothing of patient contacts and environmental HITES.

Depending on the duration of time between contamination of a clothing article and laundering of the contaminated article, further contamination of the laundry appliance and the wash solutions with infectious virus is therefore possible. Manual as opposed to machine clothes washing, which still occurs to some extent even in developed countries, presents additional opportunities for contamination of secondary surfaces with infectious virus Infectious SARS-CoV-2 dried upon a hard surface such as steel laundry tumbler may remain infectious for days, based on a review of the survival data from the literature Similarly, data for survival of SARS-CoV-2 on skin 15 , 35 indicate that the virus may remain infectious on contaminated skin for hours.

The half-life of SARS-CoV-2 at 25 °C on human skin was found to be 3. Harbourt et al. These survival data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 remains infectious on hard surfaces and human skin for hours to days, while influenza virus remains infectious for minutes to hours.

This informs the need for hand and appliance hygiene practices to limit potential spread of virus Fig. A recent study has indicated that SARS-CoV-2 can survive in wastewater, with a decay half-life of 0.

These results are in agreement with empirical data indicating the persistence in wastewater of infectious mouse hepatitis virus-1 a betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV a betacoronavirus , and transmissible gastroenteritis virus an alphacoronavirus 37 , 38 , and for the alphacoronavirus HCoVE There is a possibility, therefore, of cross-contamination of otherwise virus-free clothing when washed together with a SARS-CoVcontaminated clothing article.

Such possibilities could be mitigated through the use of an appropriately formulated laundry sanitizer with demonstrated efficacy for inactivating coronaviruses. To suggest utility under field-use conditions, the concentrations of a formulated microbicidal active-containing laundry sanitizer tested in laboratory virucidal efficacy studies should be relevant to those obtained during clothes-washing when the laundry sanitizer is used as instructed.

The QAC-containing products evaluated in Table 2 suspension inactivation studies are intended to be used in a pre-wash soak cycle using a dilution for viral inactivation, relative to the concentration in the products themselves.

The PCMX-containing product is intended to be used either in the wash cycle or in the pre-soak cycle. In either case, the product is recommended to be used a dilution for 15 min contact time.

The use concentrations and times have therefore been modeled appropriately in the suspension tests in Table 2. Under these conditions, inactivation of HCoV E or SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of soil load was complete, to the limit of detection of the assay used to determine titer.

There are multiple opportunities for dissemination of virus during the laundering process, and not all of these are addressed by the actual efficacy for removal and inactivation of the detergent and water-based washing and rinsing process.

Other risks Fig. Laundry sanitizers are used to enhance the efficacy of pathogen inactivation that may potentially occur during the manual or machine clothes washing and rinsing processes.

A laundry sanitizer, added either during the pre-soak or wash stages of the washing process, may afford inactivation of viruses over that expected of the laundry detergent or hot water rinse alone, especially for non-enveloped viruses not expected to be inactivated by detergent These data suggest that use of a laundry sanitizer may afford additional mitigation of the risk of cross-contamination of the washing appliance be it machine or basin , adjacent surfaces, the wastewater stream, and the hands of individuals engaging in washing of clothes contaminated with SARS-CoV-2, influenza viruses, or other emerging enveloped viruses.

United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health Care Facilities. Background G. Laundering and Bedding.

Bloomfield SF, Exner M, Signorelli C, Scott EA. Effectiveness of laundering processes used in household home settings. Ijaz, M. Soap, water, and SARS-CoV an ancient handwashing strategy for preventing dissemination of a new virus. PeerJ 9 , e Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar.

Bockmühl, D. Laundry hygiene—how to get more than clean. J Appl Microbiol , — Article PubMed Google Scholar. Gerba, C. Enteric virus survival during household laundering and impact of disinfection with sodium hypochlorite.

Appl Environ Microbiol 73 14 , — Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Chin, A. et al. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions.

Lancet Microbe 1 1 , E Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Guillier, L. Modeling the inactivation of viruses from the Coronaviridae family in response to temperature and relative humidity in suspensions or on surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 86 18 , ee Gross, A.

Graywater Reuse CRC Press, Google Scholar. Laitala, K. Global laundering practices—Alternatives to machine washing.

Househ Pers Care Today 12 5 , 10—16 Laundry and textile hygiene in healthcare and beyond. Microbial Cell 6 7 , — Reynolds, K. Quantifying pathogen infection risks from household laundry practices.

Article Google Scholar. British Standards Institute. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of virucidal activity in the medical area. ASTM International. ASTM E— Standard practice to assess virucidal activity of chemicals intended for disinfection of inanimate, nonporous environmental surfaces.

Reed, L. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hygiene 27 , — Harbourt, D. Modeling the stability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 SARS-CoV-2 on skin, currency, and clothing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14 11 , e Liu, Y. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on environmental surfaces and in human excreta.

J Hosp Infect , P Kasloff, S. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on critical personal protective equipment. I have, for all our peace of mind, checked with the NHS and this should cover your needs. Clothing should be washed at the hottest possible temperature the fabric will withstand.

The clothing should not be washed with other household members clothing. It must be emphasised that there is a risk that the items may be damaged during the washing process due to the high temperatures required to render the item of clothing safe.

The laundry will not be held liable for any damage to such items. If the clothing is not labelled with the patients name the laundry staff will need informing prior to the clothing being sent.

Relatives should wash hands thoroughly after handling items. I would be very interested to see where you got this information from, that it blocks viruses from spreading or contaminating clothes and slows the spread of the virus.

Do please send links to any scientific papers or authoritative health websites like the NHS and not, for instance a website like GOOP. Anyhow, just thought you might like to have a gander at this link.

This is all very well day to day… I am a nurse on a chemotherapy unit, administering cytotoxic drugs to cancer patients.

They are ill anyway and the poisons we give them knock out their immune systems so they are at high risk of sepsis. Believe it or not, but nurses have to launder their own uniforms, so I use the anti-bacterial liquid to protect my patients.

What is shocking to read is that you have to launder your own uniform. I would be very interested to know the advice given by your NHS trust on how you should do that.

Is anti-bacterial cleanser recommended? Recommendations may well differ from trust to trust. Ah well, your patients are very lucky that you take such care. OH MY GOODNESS!! All afternoon I have been talking about buying this to wash preowned baby Clothes should I?

Then I came across your blog whilst searching for where to buy it from…. You say it all! I had to get both of my daughters to stop and listen to me reading everything out!

Coronavirus has knocked some of the wind out of me. But it just shows that one message can change the world… well, not the world, but it certainly gives me heart. Thanks so much for getting in contact, I hope you follow the blog now and stay off the Antibac Laundry stuff, a good soak will work wonders!

Best wishes to you, Michelle. The dettol product you specifically write about whilst is advertised as antibacterial, does also kill viruses. Whilst I agree the product generates more potential plastic waste the suggestion of washing at a high temperature also has environmental impacts such as increased use of energy and reduced washing machine life for example through increased limescale.

This product is therefore not a complete waste of time or some marketing stunt. Hi Ken, thanks for posting. The article was written nearly a year before Coronavirus hit us, so perhaps it needs updating. I shall look into it further.

After all, if it only takes 20 seconds with a bar of soap and warm water to wash your hands free of coronavirus, why would your clothes need antibacterial laundry cleanser or a wash at 60°?

Dillie thanks for your reply. I am genuinely intrigued and looking at alternatives such as vinegar as suggested by Lacu. However to answer your question it is common advice that to kill germs you should wash at a high temperature on your washing machine.

Another reason i think the scenarios are different is the texture of your skin is very different to clothing which is obviously absorbent, whereas skin is a waterproof layer intended to protect us. Hi Ken You are correct that water over 61C increases Limescale deposits.

However, that problem is solved by using a water softener. Using an antibacterial agent to prolong the life of a washing machine seems a very roundabout justification for it!

I put white vinegar in the softener drawer to reduce limescale deposits, fix colors and soften the laundry. Hi again Ken, thanks for writing back — this is entirely the kind of discourse I hoped this blog would encourage.

I did indeed go to that government webpage thanks for posting the link and read it carefully. The section on laundry is very short, and I quote it here. There is no additional washing requirement above what would normally be carried out. If we spend our lives trying to kill all germs that might be on our clothes, the water table will be so full of chemicals that pollution levels will rise yet further.

If there has been infection, it would be safe to leave any clothes, bedding etc. A study printed in the Lancet clearly states that fabric is safe after two days, that the virus cannot be retrieved from cloth after that time.

So what I would do is gather up the items that need washing, put them in a basket, tuck the basket in a corner somewhere, sanitise my hands carefully and wait two days. Obviously, if you absolutely have to wash infected clothing or bedding immediately, you will take whatever measures you feel are necessary.

And that will make Covid look like a picnic. I use to add the Dettol laundry cleanser to my washing machine routine when I wash below 60 degrees so everything except towels and sheets.

I thought it was more hygienic for the underwears, especially after experiencing vaginal candidosis. Do you think it is a waste even in that case? Ps: indications on the back bottle about how to use Dettol to kill viruses Coronavirus types included are not recent, they have been there for years.

Oh, thanks for that information, I thought the mention of coronavirus was new… But I do think that if coronavirus can be vanquished by 20 seconds hand washing with a bar of soap, then Dettol are being disingenuous. There are quite a lot of websites out there with a deliberately medical feel and look to them of which I am very wary.

Soaking for 24 hours in a bucket should help if you are anxious. Stay well, anyhow! Vaginal candidosis is caused by a fungus, not by bacteria. Therefore a bactericidal laundry cleanser will do nothing to prevent it. That smell is caused by moulds molds in American , not bacteria. What a fabulous reply, thanks for that.

germs and bacteria are removed when washing at 60 degrees, would you say that soap is enough and therefore washing above 30 degrees unless for tough stains on towels and bed sheets is unnecessary?

Reading the labels of products like Dettol and Calgon I understand that they are not used to remove bacteria from the clothes, but to protect the washing machine from growing bacteria.

Someone above posted a link to the government webpage prepared by Public Health England, specifically to deal with coronavirus and I read it carefully. The section on laundry is very short, and I quote it again.

So I cannot find any official body that says you need to wash at 60° or even that Antibacterial Laundry cleanser is needed. To minimise the possibility of dispersing virus through the air, do not shake dirty laundry prior to washing. So in this case the warmest setting on most machines would be 90 degrees as some sources have suggested that even at 60 degrees it may not kill all microbes.

I was not referring to Coronavirus this time but to germs and bacteria in general both when doing laundry and when dishwashing.

With no laundry cleanser involved in the washing cycle, just the water and detergent. Hi again Lacu. There are tiny microorganisms everywhere in the air — bacteria, viruses, fungi, yeasts, prions — and not all of them are pathogens.

Truly, this obsession with adding super-chemicals to our laundry is an unnecessary expense that benefits only the company and is driven by the need for profit.

actually I do close the lid when flushing the toilet because the towels are not too far 🙂 and my toothbrushes are covered by caps. However, I research carefully. Here is my considered answer.

What you want is clean towels. If your towels have had a lot of use, wash at a higher temperature. If you have Covid, leave the towels untouched for two days. This is enough to let the virus die on the towel. Then wash as normal. This will be hygienic. If you are short of towels and need to touch them before the two day period, put on rubber gloves, drop the towels in a bucket and pour boiling water over them.

Then wash at whatever temperature feels safest. Again, I was not talking about Covid when i was asking about the washing temperature, but thank you for the reply 🙂. Interesting article. The only thing I find is that it helps to get rid of the stinky BO smell.

I must have rampant bacteria in my armpits and my clothes just retain the smell after washing. I wear a polyester shirt for my uniform, like the worst material for me! So for some reason this product helps. But I apply it either directly to the armpits or soak the shirt in it before washing.

Horrible fabric! Have you tried soaking it for a couple of days in cold water with a splash of vinegar and a teaspoonful of bicarb before putting it in the wash? I will try this on a shirt that I will be replacing next I dont trust polyester, that the wash cycle will remove the vinegar smell…nothing like smelling of fish and chips at work 😂 I am happy to use this shitIdontneed to kill the bacteria and save my colleagues from my BO for now 👌🏻👌🏻.

You could always just try soaking it in cold water with bicarb only. Thanks for posting. What if you or a member of your household has HPV of whatever kind?

If you warts that touch clothing, it could spread to loved ones clothing. What an interesting question. I also found this on pubmed. However, transmission is not known to occur by this route. Pubmed is a very useful website which collects medical publications on studies from all over the world.

So I think you can rest easy about this problem. Hi Dillie, Thanks for this. I worry about the effects of antibacterials being ingested by children and destroying gut health. We do not need to try and kill all bacteria.

We have trillions of bacteria in and on us that we need for good health. Keep blogging. Can dettol laundry sanitiser cause water blisters as an allergic reaction when sheets and nightie washed in it by my well meaning carer?

I wrote that piece before Covid locked us all up. I suppose I should edit the piece to say that. Thanks for the nudge. I only moved to the UK when you wrote this post but had known a similar product in the same kind of bottle in Germany for quite a while. So not as something to use in every wash, and not using fear as a selling point.

What a terrible marketing trick to make something that might be useful once a year or less when stuff really reeks into a necessity. But it happens all. PS: admittedly, I bought a different brand version of this to save two t-shirts for which nothing else seems to work. Making this stuff even more unnecessary!

Thanks Alexandra. The trouble with sports clothes is, of course, that they are made with synthetic materials which hold the smells much worse than natural fabrics! Kangarama is a textile science and technology company developing anti-bacterial and anti-viral wear in the medical sector.

Our technology-based fabrics are researched, refined, modified and tested to keep your scrubs free from microorganisms. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Then you do not need Dettol® Antibacterial Laundry Cleanser. Talk about inventing something completely unnecessary… I am racking my brains to think why you might need hygienic clothing.

And here it is, in serried ranks, waiting to be bought… © Chloë Goodridge, special researcher to Ms. Still life with biscuit tin. How many laundries has the water in my tea been through, I wonder? OMG, my cupboard is full of unhygienic clothing! Clean Seasalt socks.

Whoever thought they might give me flu AND herpes!!! Photo by Ayotunde Oguntoyinbo on Unsplash. Piper knows instinctively that a comforting cuddle is far more important than hygienic laundry. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like Loading They are on my list, never fear!

A great Dillie diatribe sets me up for the afternoo. Totally agree. And disposable wipes, which come in more varieties than I thought possible: antibacterial, multi-purpose, floor, bathroom, toilet, kitchen, window… I have a selection of cotton dishcloths which are used to wipe down whatever needs wiping down in the kitchen and then flung in the washing machine.

Love this! This blog is Shit You Need — No Shit…. I worship you more and more with every blog post. Lorraine Like Liked by 1 person. Dettol recently announced that their wet wipes are now biodegradable.

About time too. By the way Dettol the original is toxic to dogs. I am loving your posts Dillie! Antibacterial laundry cleanser… whatever next? Thank you xx Like Like. Thanks Christine! Life expectancy since the s, when these anti-bacterial products started to multiply, has NOT improved — indeed, in the US, where anti-bac products are even more ubiquitous, life expectancy has gone down since the s Yes — it IS important to include scientific and statistical facts — as above.

Excellent reply, thanks so much. Well done on using real nappies — and I do like the sound of your essential oil blend… Like Like. And you! Maybe it is best for those who do not have a chance to dry clothes in the sun Like Like. pdf Like Like. Hi Dillie, I use to add the Dettol laundry cleanser to my washing machine routine when I wash below 60 degrees so everything except towels and sheets.

Hi again Dillie, germs and bacteria are removed when washing at 60 degrees, would you say that soap is enough and therefore washing above 30 degrees unless for tough stains on towels and bed sheets is unnecessary?

Thanks Like Like. Hi Dillie and Ken, thank you for the kind reply! Hi Dillie, actually I do close the lid when flushing the toilet because the towels are not too far 🙂 and my toothbrushes are covered by caps. I hope this helps. Again, I was not talking about Covid when i was asking about the washing temperature, but thank you for the reply 🙂 Like Like.

Thanks Lacu, I try to be comprehensive! I will try this on a shirt that I will be replacing next I dont trust polyester, that the wash cycle will remove the vinegar smell…nothing like smelling of fish and chips at work 😂 I am happy to use this shitIdontneed to kill the bacteria and save my colleagues from my BO for now 👌🏻👌🏻 Like Like.

If you warts that touch clothing, it could spread to loved ones clothing Like Like. Keep blogging Like Like. Ah, keep shouting! Thanks for the support. Thanks Liz, I shall! Trying to find cause of them apart from recent op with anaesthetic chemicals.

Leave a comment Cancel reply. Comment Reblog Subscribe Subscribed.

Are you EGCG and autoimmune diseases to eat your underpants? Suck angi-viral jeans? EGCG and autoimmune diseases a nasty cut with deteegent freshly washed sweater? Talk about inventing something completely unnecessary…. Are you working in a research lab under the strictest of conditions? In which case, the lab will have its own routines, procedures and special clothing that keep the lab sterile. Same with a hospital.