Issues Vatiability African Mango seed triglyceride levels. Download Variabi,ity. Glycemic variability GI variability vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, another Muscle repair supplements pilot varibility indicated that once-weekly trelagliptin and once-daily alogliptin improved glycemic control and reduced GV without inducing hypoglycemia [ 95 ]. However, high FId pigs reduced FI to a larger extent than their counterparts, which may indicate some temporary negative consequences of high initial FI.

GI variability -

Developed as a way to help diabetic individuals control their blood sugar, glycemic index is intended to represent the inherent effect a food has on blood sugar levels. However, glycemic index is becoming used for broader purposes such as food labeling, and has served as the basis for several popular diets.

To study whether glycemic index values are accurate and reproducible, Matthan and her colleagues recruited 63 volunteers, who underwent six testing sessions over 12 weeks. Volunteers fasted and abstained from exercise and alcohol before each session.

They then consumed either white bread, a simple carbohydrate that served as the test food, or a glucose drink, which served as a reference control, in random order. Each contained 50 grams of available carbohydrate. Blood glucose levels were measured at multiple time points for five hours after eating, and glycemic index was calculated by standard formulas.

Each blue dot represents the average of three glycemic index value determinations for an individual subject. Horizontal bars represent the standard deviations. Adapted from Matthan et al However, deviations averaged 15 points in either direction, effectively placing white bread in all three glycemic index categories.

It would be considered a low glycemic index food average values of 35 to 55 for 22 of the volunteers, intermediate glycemic index 57 to 67 for 23 volunteers, and high glycemic index 70 to for 18 volunteers. Even within the same individual, glycemic index values could differ by more than 60 points between trials.

Our data suggest those values may not be reliable in terms of a daily intake. Lichtenstein , D. Download: PPT. Table 2.

Linear Regression Analysis results between global cognition, attention, visuospatial and memory scores and glycemic variability parameters. Discussion The findings of the present study demonstrated that some degree of cognitive decline was associated with high indices of glucose variability independent of average glucose levels.

Conclusion The present findings indicate that high glucose variability was associated with cognitive decline independently of mean blood glucose levels.

Supporting Information. S1 Table. Correlation Analysis results between cognitive function test z-scores and other dependent variables. s DOCX. S2 Table. Linear Regression Analysis results between language, executive function scores and glycemic variability parameters.

Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: HCC JHS. References 1. Messier C, Awad-Shimoon N, Gagnon M, Desrochers A, Tsiakas M Glucose regulation is associated with cognitive performance in young nondiabetic adults. Behav Brain Res 81— Riby LM, McLaughlin J, Riby DM, Graham C Lifestyle, glucose regulation and the cognitive effects of glucose load in middle-aged adults.

Br J Nutr — Whitmer RA, Sidney S, Selby J, Johnston SC, Yaffe K Midlife cardiovascular risk factors and risk of dementia in late life. Neurology — Biessels GJ, Deary IJ, Ryan CM Cognition and diabetes: a lifespan perspective.

Lancet Neurol 7: — Cukierman-Yaffe T, Gerstein HC, Williamson JD, Lazar RM, Lovato L, Miller ME, et al. Diabetes Care — Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA, Summers KH, McCall A, Grimm KJ, et al.

Diabetes Care 71— Whitmer RA, Karter AJ, Yaffe K, Quesenberry CP Jr. JAMA — Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al. Endocr Pract — Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman RR, Sherwin R, et al.

Diabetologia 17— The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The relationship of glycemic exposure HbA1c to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes — Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Takao T, Ide T, Yanagisawa H, Kikuchi M, Kawazu S, Matsuyama Y The effect of fasting plasma glucose variability on the risk of retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients: retrospective long-term follow-up.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract — Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL For debate. Glucose variability and diabetes complication risk: we need to know the answer. Diabet Med — Quagliaro L, Piconi L, Assaloni R, Martinelli L, Motz E, Ceriello A Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis related to oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: the role of protein kinase C and NAD P H-oxidase activation.

Ceriello A, Esposito K, Piconi L, Ihnat MA, Thorpe JE, Testa R, et al. Bragd J, Adamson U, Backlund LB, Lins PE, Moberg E, Oskarsson P Can glycaemic variability, as calculated from blood glucose self-monitoring, predict the development of complications in type 1 diabetes over a decade?

Diabetes Metab — Geijselaers SL, Sep SJ, Stehouwer CD, Biessels GJ Glucose regulation, cognition, and brain MRI in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3: 75— Lin CC, Yang CP, Li CI, Liu CS, Chen CC, Lin WY, et al.

BMC Med Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery SNSB. Ahn H-J, Chin J, Park A, Lee BH, Suh MK, Seo SW, et al. Journal of Korean medical science — Abbatecola AM, Rizzo MR, Barbieri M, Grella R, Arciello A, Laieta MT, et al.

Crane PK, Walker R, Hubbard RA, Li G, Nathan DM, Zheng H, et al. N Engl J Med — Kerti L, Witte AV, Winkler A, Grittner U, Rujescu D, Flöel A. Kielstein JT Glucose levels and risk of dementia. N Engl J Med View Article Google Scholar Launer LJ, Miller ME, Williamson JD, Lazar RM, Gerstein HC, Murray AM, et al.

Lancet Neurol — For each glucose datum after the first n hours of observations, the difference between the current glucose and the glucose n hours previous is determined. n can vary from 1 to 8 h. The period of analysis is 24 h minus n.

CONGA is expressed as the SD of the differences despite their lack of normal distribution Fig. CONGA 1 analysis for the breakfast meal day 1 from Fig. For illustration purposes only 4 h are shown. The insert shows the frequency distribution of the sequential glucose differences, which clearly does not have a normal distribution.

For none of these parameters—MAD, MAG and CONGA n —has a rationale been promulgated to support its use. Since each was based on examinations of tracings from patients with diabetes rather than normal subjects, it is difficult to assign any biological relevance to them.

Reliance solely on mathematical manipulations to the exclusion of relevance is analogous to the feckless statistician who drowned wading across a river whose average depth he calculated to be 4 feet: failure to appreciate the relevance of the variation in water depth from shore to shore was his undoing.

Inclusion of all data points fails to discriminate glycemia directly related to excursions from that which might be considered as noise. Furthermore, it is difficult to identify a biorhythm with periodicities of 1, 2, 3, or more hours implicit in the generation of CONGA n.

For postprandial hyperglycemia to play a role in the development of diabetes complications, its influence must exceed its contribution to mean glycemia.

Otherwise the effect of improved mean glycemia is amenable to study with techniques less arduous than the task of controlling postprandial hyperglycemia Implicit in the putative special role for postprandial glucose is the assumption of unique properties associated with the meal-related glucose excursion not attendant upon hyperglycemia of a similar degree in the interprandial state 10 , A clinical trial designed to assess the effect of postprandial glucose on the development of diabetes complications must ensure no difference in HbA 1c or mean glycemia while generating a difference in postprandial glycemia.

To achieve these goals, the interprandial glucose would of necessity have to increase, thereby resulting in reduced glucose excursions When measured in this context postprandial glucose therefore takes on the mantle of a surrogate for glycemic variability.

Assessment of postprandial glycemia poses not just a difficult but a virtually impossible task when limited to one after-meal determination: a static measurement in a dynamic situation.

In persons without diabetes, glucose responses to food ingestion are influenced by the size, composition, and time of day of the meal 39 , The responses in patients with diabetes are more variable Even in the situation of complete ascertainment from continuous glucose monitoring, reliance on peak postprandial glucose as a measure of variability is fraught with potential error because it represents only the north end of the meal-related excursion; without the south end there is no actual excursion.

Without documentation of the starting point of an excursion its size cannot be known. Two quantifications of risk for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia have been reported under the rubric of glucose variability 42 , High BG index HBGI and low BG index LBGI are generated from a correction of the skewness of glycemia narrow hypoglycemic vs.

broad hyperglycemic range through a symmetrization process around zero equivalent to glucose The rationale for this maneuver is not stated nor is it readily inferred since risks associated with hypoglycemia are different from those associated with hyperglycemia in type, timing, and predictability, and they have no interaction.

Larger values of LBGI and HBGI indicate higher risk for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, respectively. Although originally developed from self-monitored BG data, these parameters have been adapted to continuous interstitial glucose monitoring Correlations between LBGI and subsequent hypoglycemia and between HBGI and HbA 1c have been reported.

The glycemic risk assessment diabetes equation GRADE score was created to summarize the degree of risk associated with a glucose profile Qualitative risk scoring for a wide range of glucose levels inclusive of marked hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia was generated by a committee of diabetes practitioners.

The nature of the risk was not specified. An undesirable value of LBGI, HBGI, or GRADE should lead to an immediate change in therapy for the purpose of mitigating future adverse events rather than act as predictors in the face of persistent flawed treatment.

This substance has been proposed as a surrogate marker for glycemic excursions Once circulating glucose levels exceed the renal threshold for glucosuria plasma, levels of 1,5-anhydroglucitol all because its renal reabsorption is competitively inhibited by glucose.

Distinction between chronic and intermittent hyperglycemia, both of which are characterized by low concentrations of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, is governed by the HbA 1c level, which when normal or near-so suggests intermittent forays of glycemia into the hyperglycemic range, i.

There are several limitations of 1,5-anhydroglucitol as a measure of glycemic variability. There have been no randomized clinical trials directed at this question despite inferences from secondary analyses 6 — 8.

Although the Hyperglycemia and Its Effect After Acute Myocardial Infarction on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus HEART2D trial, which compared prandial to basal glucose control, was 38 not specifically designed to evaluate glycemic variability, inferences can be drawn from the narrower range of glucose values in the prandial wing.

A retrospective analysis concluded that improved glycemic variability lower MAG with no differences in SD or MAGE in the prandial versus basal treatment groups had no effect on cardiovascular outcomes This interpretation has been disputed partly on the basis of the exclusive reliance on MAG, an alleged unvalidated measure of variability to the exclusion of other established metrics In a cross-sectional study of type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients an association was found between cardiovascular risk factors and measures of average glycemia mean BG and HbA 1c but not with measures of glycemic variability MAGE, CONGA 4 , and postprandial glucose increment In a randomized trial in type 2 diabetes not specifically designed to address the effect of glycemic variability, lower postprandial and higher fasting glycemia led to a regression in carotid intima thickness despite no change in HbA 1c In that utopian situation, the currently available measures of glycemic variability can be retired.

In their place, specific metrics that characterize the primary features of the meal-related excursion such as glucose rise to peak, time to peak, and timeliness of recovery to baseline glycemia would be appropriate Fig.

The orange line is a stylized representation of the best that can be achieved currently for meal-related glucose control in diabetes. Once therapies become available to bend the postprandial curve to match that of nondiabetic subjects yellow line , new metrics will be needed.

Unlike the integrated measure of long-term glucose control provided by a single quarterly determination of HbA1c glycemic variability by nature requires comprehensive assessment of glycemia. Whereas continuous BG analysis provides an accurate recording of glycemia during ambulatory fed conditions it has not been adapted to the free-living state.

Although not constrained by that limitation, continuous interstitial glucose monitoring is hampered by variable and unpredictable inaccuracies The task therefore, of assessing a role for glycemic variability in the development of diabetes complications is fraught with difficulty.

The question may ultimately prove to be moot should elimination of the complications of diabetes ensue from the bending of the prandial glycemic curve to that of nondiabetic subjects.

See accompanying article, p. Sign In or Create an Account. Search Dropdown Menu. header search search input Search input auto suggest. filter your search All Content All Journals Diabetes. Advanced Search.

User Tools Dropdown. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Close navigation menu Article navigation. Volume 62, Issue 5. Previous Article Next Article. Measures of glucose variability.

Glucose variability and the complications of diabetes. Article Navigation. Point-Counterpoint April 16 Glucose Variability F. John Service F.

Thank you variabilihy African Mango seed triglyceride levels nature. You are using a vadiability version with GI variability support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Time in range TIR is an index of glycemic control obtained from continuous glucose monitoring CGM. The GII study investigated the effects of voluntary feed intake FI African Mango seed triglyceride levels first days after weaning variabilihy gastrointestinal vaeiability and variabiloty fermentation African Mango seed triglyceride levels first week after weaning and growth performance and feeding patterns during the nursery phase. Each pen variabolity equipped GI variability an electronic feeding station Herbal Detox Products monitoring individual FI during a d study. Feeding patterns per day, FI, and growth performance were measured individually. In conclusion, pigs with high FId became faster eaters with higher FI and growth rates toward the second half of the nursery, which was similar and additive for pigs with higher weaning BW. High FId was also associated with greater development of the gastrointestinal tract and a reduced protein fermentation 1-wk after weaning. Poor adaptation to solid feed after weaning is often associated with a reduced digestive function and growth in nursery pigs. The reasons driving an early acceptance of feed and its consequences are still largely unknown.