Category: Home

Chromium browser for media streaming

Chromium browser for media streaming

Krishna Chromuum Vint Cerf Jeff Dean John Doerr Sanjay Ghemawat Al Gore John L. I'd probably advise trying out the latest version of Video. Timeline of web browsers.

Chromium browser for media streaming -

Improve this answer. edited Apr 25, at answered Apr 25, at Jerry Jerry 1 1 silver badge 7 7 bronze badges. I need to bisect an issue in Google Chrome while streaming videos, but this is of course not possible using the default python's bisect tools and Chromium builds, by any chance have you considered providing this capability with your website's builds?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged video browser chromium codec h. The Overflow Blog.

The creator of PyTorch Lightning on the AI hype cycle. Exploring the inclusive tech revolution sponsored post. What would you like to change about the moderator election process?

Site maintenance - Saturday, February 24th, , - UTC 9 AM - Linked 5. Related 3. It has been mentioned more then once in x11 thread, that hw acceleration will not be actively worked on. So I more then welcome user contributions, as in drivers or chromium with acceleration packaged in.

deb format, multiple debs for hardware platforms is a solution. But to much work for me right now. Your contribution with the x11 launcher for OSMC has been valuable to me. I can still make good use of it… I was able to install Firefox ESR and I use that for Fender Play guitar lessons.

knowledge to understand why, but Fender Play runs worse in Chromium. But YouTube is even worse still in Firefox than it was in Chromium. For simply watching YouTube videos the Kodi add-on is the way to go.

I believe Pi moved to Firefox because they had issues with Chrome forcing advertising. It went 26 minutes, 19 seconds. Test 7 used SMplayer media player, unencrypted, using the Mplayer backend with HAVD enabled. It went 44 minutes, 9 seconds. Test 8 used Waterfox It went 41 minutes, 30 seconds.

Test 9 used SMplayer on Windows 10 with HAVD enabled. That should, if anything, theoretically increase the play time, as the wireless link would not have to be used to transmit the data to the PC.

Yes, surprisingly, Linux beat it by one minute. Test 10 used Waterfox on Windows 10 playing the encrypted video. HAVD on. It went 30 min 39 sec. Test 11 used Chromium 78, unpatched, from the Ubuntu repo. HAVD is not available with this build.

With the encrypted video, it went 26 minutes, 7 seconds. Test 12 used Vivaldi 2. With the encrypted video, it went 30 minutes, 57 seconds. I repeated the unencrypted Waterfox test and got 34 minutes, 15 seconds again. Amazingly consistent! I then tried disabling the seconds on the systray clock and the realtime CPU monitor I have there, seeing perhaps if these were keeping the CPU from entering a deeper power saving state.

I decided to disable the things that made use of a timer for the updates in the same manner, which immediately brought those two things to mind. On that test, my notes say First, the methodology seems valid, given how repeatable they were. In two identical tests, I got the same result to the second.

A third repetition with a few minor changes came in within about 15 seconds of the first two. Second, there was no discernible difference between Linux and Windows when running the same test, which I did twice. On SMplayer, which is only able to play the unencrypted video, the run time was about a minute longer in Linux, while the encrypted Waterfox test was 16 seconds better in Windows.

Previous video playback tests on Linux and Windows have shown that Windows had a significant advantage in battery run time, so this is quite a nice thing. While it will still be necessary to play unencrypted videos in dedicated media players in order to do it, it does not appear that there will be any loss in run time while streaming videos on battery power, on my Swift at least.

Third, the HAVD unencrypted video in Chromium on Linux did increase the run time by a significant margin from 26 to 32 minutes , which was as expected, but what surprises me was that I got the same result with the encrypted video, from 24 minutes to 30 minutes.

To be certain, I repeated the encrypted video tests on Chromium with HAVD on and off and found the same large gap. That led me to think: Perhaps the issue here is that the patching to enable the hardware acceleration somehow harms the unaccelerated mode?

That was the reason for test 11, which demonstrated that the unpatched Chromium is just as bad with the run time as the patched one with the HAVD feature disabled. Oddly, Vivaldi, which is based on the same Chromium base version as the unpatched Chromium used for the test, scored significantly better on the same test.

The big performance gap between HAVD-enabled and HAVD-disabled while streaming encrypted videos was not seen in Waterfox, where the times were nearly identical using Waterfox on Linux which has no HAVD and on Windows which has HAVD. Fourth, Waterfox with hardware decoding acceleration disabled as that is the only option in Waterfox on Linux significantly bests the time of Chromium with acceleration disabled on the same platform.

Chromium with HAVD enabled ran 10 seconds shorter than Waterfox with encrypted video, and 1 minute, 45 seconds shorter with the unencrypted video. That was not the result I had expected! Enabling the HAVD feature only allowed Chromium to get into the ballpark of what Waterfox offers in terms of run time.

Fifth, Waterfox with full HAVD on Windows with the unencrypted video got pretty close to the run time of the dedicated media player, at 41 min, 30 seconds and 43 minutes, 30 seconds respectively.

The poor state of HAVD in Linux Chromium could change pretty quickly as the Mojo decoder continues development, though there have not yet been any announcements about whether Google or Mozilla have any near-term plans to begin bringing HAVD to Linux, finally.

Clearly, it is possible, as SMPlayer and VLC do it brilliantly, equally so in Linux and Windows. If these results are accurate, it appears that Linux as tested is just as viable for streaming videos on battery power as Windows, on my Swift at least. With encrypted videos, using dedicated media players is not possible at least not the ones I have tried , but even then, the run time of Waterfox on Linux was as good as on Windows, so there is no loss in run time on Linux there either.

Since the same encryption schema is used by Netflix and many other similar content providers, this will be the pertinent test configuration to estimate how much streaming is possible before the battery runs out. It should be noted that pirated, unencrypted video will have the same run-time advantages as the unencrypted streams here.

Using an encrypting service like Netflix takes nearly a third of the run time away on batteries as compared to the same stream unencrypted. Ascaris: Thanks for taking the trouble to run all those tests. Have you looked at Chrome and Firefox in the same way, or are planning to?

Ex-Windows user Win. Presently on Monterey MacBook Pro circa mid, 15" display, with 16GB GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model iHQ 2. Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.

macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and now and then Chrome; security apps. Intego AV. Chrome should be the same as Chromium, as the two are almost the same.

Still, it would be interesting to verify that.

Connect and share knowledge within a single brwoser that is structured and easy Chromium browser for media streaming search. Brlwser using Chromium for a while, but it occurred to me Citrus fruit recipes most video content does not work. YouTube does, but Vimeo does not, and most video streaming sites as well as random webpages with embedded video typically don't work either. I have a few other browsers installed as well: Firefox, Brave, Google Chrome, Safari, Vivaldi, they all work fine everywhere. Chromium is the only exception.

Chromium browser for media streaming -

Create a free Team Why Teams? Learn more about Teams. Ask Question. Asked 3 years, 10 months ago. Modified 3 years, 9 months ago. Viewed 27k times. Is there a way to get this working?

I installed Chromium with brew cask. video browser chromium codec h. Improve this question. asked Apr 14, at Rog Rog 63 2 2 gold badges 2 2 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges.

Add a comment. Sorted by: Reset to default. I mixed the usage Chrome and Chromium terms in my issue description. I think I need to rename Chrome to Chromium. gkatsev misteroneill It looks there's something wrong HLS and Chromium browser.

On Google Chrome, HLS video plays successfully. I just installed Chromium latest? via official website and tried to open hls demo website and my test example which uses video.

js v7. I believe latest Chrome is It's worth noting that Chromium doesn't ship with the codecs required to play back h streams, which the default video on the example uses.

Is this related? Also in my case 7. probably up to 7. x and the whole 8 version blow up with the blob not defined stuff. Skip to content. You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

You signed out in another tab or window. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Dismiss alert. js Public. Notifications Fork 7. Additional navigation options Code Issues Pull requests Discussions Actions Projects Wiki Security Insights.

New issue. Jump to bottom. jonybekov opened this issue May 7, · 11 comments. Labels needs: triage This issue needs to be reviewed. Copy link. You can download them here: Chrome 68 x64 Chrome 53 x64 Observe video player HLS video doesn't play Errors No compatible source was found for this media.

What version of Video. js are you using? js plugins used. Register Lost your password? Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars. AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.

It's easy to post questions about Windows 11 , Windows 10 , Win8. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Contact Customer Support. Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday?

Send an email to sb askwoody. com to ask how. Mastodon profile for DefConPatch Mastodon profile for AskWoody. Register Free Newsletter Plus Membership. Patch reliability is unclear.

Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. SIGN IN Not a member? Comparing video streaming results: Waterfox, Chromium; Windows, Linux. This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 2 months ago.

Topic New Reply. Ascaris AskWoody MVP. November 17, at am There are a few things we can take away from this. Nibbled To Death By Ducks. Reply Quote. Viewing 1 reply thread. OscarCP Member. November 18, at pm Options Reply Quote. November 23, at pm Options Reply Quote.

November 26, at pm Options Reply Quote. December 7, at am Options Reply Quote. Nibbled To Death By Ducks AskWoody Plus. Just some-more grist for the exceedingly fine-grind mill. Reply To: Comparing video streaming results: Waterfox, Chromium; Windows, Linux You can use BBCodes to format your content.

Your information: Name required : Mail will not be published required : Website:. Cancel Submit. DON'T MISS OUT! Subscribe to the Free Newsletter. We promise not to spam you.

Unsubscribe at any time. Plus Membership Donations from Plus members keep this site going. Get Plus! Welcome to our unique respite from the madness. Search Newsletters Search for:. Search Forums Search for: Advanced Search. View the Forum Recent Replies My Replies My Active Topics New Posts in the Last day Private Messages How to use the Forums All Forums.

Search for Topics Most popular topics Topics with no replies Recently active topics New posts: Last day New posts: Last three days New posts: Last week New posts: Last month Topics with most replies Latest topics. Recent Topics Imaging an encryted drive by WSaltamirano 7 minutes ago.

Recent blog posts February patches for Windows Replacing WordPad and more with Office Online How to link your smartphone with Windows 11 Sandboxie-Plus — A safe place for apps to run The annoyances of a new computer Want to see the world darker?

MS-DEFCON 2: Microsoft and compliance February Office non-Security updates are now available. Login and Registration Log In Register.

All Rights Reserved. Link Text. Open link in a new tab. No search term specified. Showing recent items.

Stfeaming a question about Chromium browser for media streaming Chromiim Sign up Nutrition periodization for postpartum recovery a Speed boosting techniques GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account. I have a video player based on video. js latest version 8. In development, I'm testing my app on chromium Chromium anti-viral treatment options a free stremaing open-source web Unmatched project, primarily srreaming and maintained by Brwser. The Chromium codebase is widely used. Microsoft EdgeSamsung InternetChromium browser for media streamingand Chrimium other browsers are based on the Chromium code. Moreover, significant portions of the code are used by several app frameworks. Chromium is a free and open-source software project. The Google-authored portion is shared under the 3-clause BSD license. This licensing permits any party to build the codebase and share the resulting browser executable with the Chromium name and logo.

Author: Malacage

5 thoughts on “Chromium browser for media streaming

Leave a comment

Yours email will be published. Important fields a marked *

Design by ThemesDNA.com